" Is Judge James A. Haynes of Ravalli County Montana Corrupt, Stupid, or Both?
On December 3, 2015, Bill Windsor filed a Motion to Dismiss one of his criminal charges due to expiration of the Statute of Limitations.
It is a very simple issue, a no-brainer, but what Judge James A. Haynes did on December 4, 2015 is a stupid execution of his corruption...
First, some basics:
Crime or Offense or Event: a violation of any penal statute of the state of Montana. The State of Montana has charged in writing that Bill Windsor committed the crime of violation of a protective order on August 24, 2013.
Charge: a written statement that accuses a person of the commission of an offense, that is presented to a court. In Montana, a criminal complaint is made by the filing of an "Information." When leave to file an information has been granted, a warrant or summons may issue for the defendant's arrest or appearance, so this marks the beginning of the Prosecution. The State of Montana filed its Information on October 3, 2014.
Offender: an accused defendant in a criminal case. In this matter, Bill Windsor is the alleged Offender -- the person who allegedly committed this crime.
Prosecution: A proceeding instituted and carried on by due course of law, before a competent tribunal, for the purpose of determining the guilt or innocence of a person charged with crime. The "Prosecution" begins when the charge is filed. In this matter, that was October 3, 2014.
Proceeding: a case heard and determined by a court. In this matter, the case is DC-14-509 in the Fourth Judicial District Court in Missoula County Montana. As the Docket shows, it began on October 3, 2014.
Lesser Included Offense: defined in MCA 46-1-202(9) "Included offense" means an offense that: (a) is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged; (b) consists of an attempt to commit the offense charged or to commit an offense otherwise included in the offense charged; or (c) differs from the offense charged only in the respect that a less serious injury or risk to the same person, property, or public interest or a lesser kind of culpability suffices to establish its commission. Wikipedia explains it more clearly: A lesser included offense, in criminal law, is a crime for which all of the elements necessary to impose liability are also elements found in a more serious crime. For example, the common law crime of larceny requires the taking and carrying away of tangible property from another person, with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of that property. Robbery, under the common law, requires all of the same elements, plus the use of force or intimidation to accomplish the taking. Therefore, larceny is a lesser included offense in the offense of robbery, as every robbery includes a larceny as part of the crime. Assault is also a lesser included offense of robbery, just as battery is necessarily a lesser included offense to murder, and false imprisonment is usually a lesser included offense to kidnapping. In this matter, there was only one charge: violation of a protective order by not giving Sean Boushie the website owned by Bill Windsor promoting his movie and TV expose of Sean Boushie's criminal activiites. It was not a lesser-included offense of anything. It was a stand-alone offense.
Statute of Limitations: Laws passed by a legislative body to set the maximum time after an Event when legal Proceedings may be initiated. When the period of time specified in a statute of limitations passes, a Charge can no longer be filed. The statutory specifications are referred to as "limitations." Bill Windsor's alleged crime is a misdemeanor. The Statute of Limitations is one year. This means the Charge for the August 24, 2013 alleged crime had to be filed by August 23, 2014.
Tolling: A legal doctrine which allows for the pausing or delaying of the running of the period of time set forth by a statute of limitations. This is not relevant in this case as is explained below.
Motion To Dismiss: A motion filed asking a court to dismiss a case or Charge.
Here is the Motion to Dismiss due to Expiration of the Statute of Limitations:
William M. Windsor, Defendant, files this “Motion to Dismiss Charge #1 – Website due to Statute of Limitations,” pursuant to Montana Code Annotated (“MCA”) 45-1-205(2)(b), with incorporated Brief in Support. Windsor contacted the prosecutor’s office for concurrence, and Ms. Jennifer Clark stated that she will oppose this motion and did not have the time to justify the opposition.
MCA 45-1-205(2)(b) requires that “A prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within 1 year after it is committed.” (Milanovich v. Milanovich, (1982), 201 Mont. 332, 334, 655 P.2d 963, 964.) (See also State v. Poncelet, 187 Mont. 528, 610 P.2d 698 (Mont. 04/24/1980); Dexter v. Shields, 92 P.3d 1208, 322 Mont. 6, 2004 MT 159 (Mont. 06/22/2004); State v. Hamilton, 830 P.2d 1264, 252 Mont. 496 (Mont. 01/14/1992).)
Statute of Limitations has just become a defense in this case as the November 13, 2015 Second Amended Information [Docket #157] charges Count #1 as a misdemeanor. The State indicates this alleged crime was committed on August 24, 2013, over one year prior to the October 2, 2014 charge. The original Information said the alleged crime took place on October 2, 2014.
The substantive criminal statute is MCA 45-5-626: “(1) A person commits the offense of violation of an order of protection if the person, with knowledge of the order, purposely or knowingly violates a provision of any order provided for … under Title 40, chapter 15.” The explicit language of this statute precludes any claim that the offense is a continuing one. If it was a violation as charged, that violation took place on August 24, 2013.
A particular offense should not be construed as continuing “unless the explicit language of the substantive criminal statute compels such a conclusion, or the nature of the crime involved is such that [the legislature] must assuredly have intended that it be treated as a continuing one.” (Toussie v. United States (1970), 397 U.S. 112, 115, 90 S.Ct. 858, 860, 25 L.Ed.2d 156, 161, citing United States v. Scharton (1932), 285 U.S. 518, 52 S.Ct. 416, 76 L.Ed. 917.
In State v. Larson (1989), 240 Mont. 203, 783 P.2d 416, the criminal offenses at issue occurred in October 1985. No charges were filed, however, until February 1988. At trial, the court reduced a theft charge from felony to misdemeanor after receiving evidence of the value of the items taken. In our opinion upholding the conviction, we stated, “[a]s a general rule, a defendant may not be convicted of a lesser included offense when the statute of limitations has run on that offense but not on the larger offense charged.” Larson, 240 Mont. at 205, 783 P.2d at 417, citing the Criminal Law Commission Comments to § 45-1-205, MCA. (State v. Moga, 1999 MT 283 (Mont. 11/23/1999).)
The statute of limitations is a jurisdictional issue. Milanovich v. Milanovich, supra. The alleged crime was committed on August 24, 2013 and was not charged until October 2, 2014. This Court has no jurisdiction as the statute of limitations on this misdemeanor expired.
In addition, the Second Amended information does not comply with the law. MCA 46-11-205 requires an affidavit stating facts that show the existence of probable cause to support the charge as amended. There is no affidavit.
WHEREFORE, for the reasons stated above, William M. Windsor requests that this Court order that Charge #1 is dismissed and order that Windsor has no restrictions on his websites.
This 2nd day of December 2015,
William M. Windsor
On December 3, 2015, Judge James A. Haynes scribbled an "order" in the upper right hand corner of the Motion. It says: "Defendant Windsor consistently extracts snippets of the law convenient to his arguments, and overlooks the rest. He has done so again, ignoring 45-1-206(3) MCA and State v. Moga, 1999 MT 283, 297 Mont. 1, 989 P.2d 856. This 'motion' may be filed, and this Order Denying Windsor's Motion to Dismiss is Final and requires no further briefing."
So, let's take a look at what Judge James A. Haynes has done to illustrate how corrupt judges operate:
First, he headed this Motion off at the pass. The State of Montana was not required to file a response, as the rules provide. So, Bill Windsor was denied due process. The State should have either responded that he is correct or come up with some bogus argument against the Motion. Judge James A. Haynes didn't even allow the Clerk of the Court to file the motion until after he decided whether he would allow it. Judge James A. Haynes has not allowed many of Bill Windsor's motions as this is one of the ways corrupt judges taint the record in a case.
Second, he did not issue an actual order. This is a simulated action that will not actually show up on the Court Docket.
Third, he has once again demeaned Bill Windsor improperly, demonstrating his extreme bias. Bill Windsor has never extracted snippets. He always reviews every case on an issue. In his Motion, he cited eight cases, including the only case that Judge James A. Haynes cited. Bill Windsor cited four relevant statutes while Judge James A. Haynes cited a statute on tolling that has no relevance whatsoever to this matter. He further demeans Bill Windsor by putting the word "motion" in quotes so as to mock it. The motion is perfect -- short, sweet, totally in compliance with the Montana Rules of Civil Procedure and the District Court Rules and the Local Rules, and a slam dunk winner. Criminal defendants are entitled to a fair and impartial judge. "Judge" James A. Haynes is totally biased, and Bill Windsor has been repeatedly denied a fair pre-trial, and he expects the same mistreatment at the trial.
Fourth, he committed obstruction of justice by lying in his Order, and he denied Bill Windsor's Constitutional rights to due process. He cited a completely bogus statute as his authority -- MCA 45-1-206(3). Here's what this statute says: "45-1-206. Periods excluded from limitation. The period of limitation does not run during: (3) a prosecution pending against the offender for the same conduct, even if the indictment, complaint, or information which commences the prosecution is dismissed." This statute clearly addresses periods of time that are excluded from the statute of limitations period. The statute immediately preceding MCA 45-1-206 is MCA 45-1-205. General time limitations spells out the limitations periods for various crimes. MCA 45-1-205(2)(b) says: "(b) A prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within 1 year after it is committed."
So, let's put this in terms that a Fifth Grader in a state other than Montana would understand. A "Limitation" sets the maximum time after an Event when legal proceedings may be initiated. The State of Montana says the Event in this matter took place on August 24, 2013. So, the clock starts on August 24, 2013. The Limitation on this charge, a misdemeanor, is one year. So, legal Proceedings had to begin not later than August 23, 2014. But they did not begin until October 3, 2014 -- 406 days -- 41 days past the one year time limitation. Judge James A. Haynes said in his "order" that Bill Windsor ignored 45-1-206(3) MCA. Damn right he did because it has no relevance at all. The Prosecution began on October 3, 2014. The Limitations period had already expired. There was no limitations period to run after the Charge was filed.
Bill Windsor searched every appellate court decision EVER on MCA 45-1-206(3), and State v. Moga, 1999 MT 283 (Mont. 11/23/1999) is the only case. But all it says is that (a) a prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within one year after the offense is committed; (b) MCA 45-1-205 provides that a prosecution is commenced when an information or complaint is filed; (c) the Event (crime) was committed on March 13, 1997, and the Information was filed on April 7, 1997, so only 25 days after the Event, well within the one-year statute of limitations for misdemeanors; (d) the running of the statute of limitations is tolled when a prosecution is pending against the offender for the same conduct. An Amended Information was filed April 14, 1998, and Mora argued that the Event was March 13, 1997 and the Amended Information was April 14, 1998, so the one-year statute of limitations expired.
But that argument was bogus and this is irrelevant in this case because Bill Windsor's Event was August 24, 2013, and the Prosecution began on October 3, 2014 -- 41 days past the year limitation.
If Bill Windsor was making the bogus argument that Mora made, he would be claiming that the Amended Information filed on November 13, 2015 meant that there had been 812 days. Mora tried to use the Amended Information to turn his 25 day Event to prosecution time into 392 days by claiming the commencement of the prosecution didn't begin until the date of the Amended Information. The Amended Information in Bill Windsor's case is irrelevant to the Statute of Limitations.
Bill Windsor says that Judge James A. Haynes appears to be intelligent, just mean and dishonest. But it is hard to explain how a "judge" can say that Bill Windsor did not qualify for a temporary order of protection as Sean Boushie had not been arrested or convicted. That's what Judge James A. Haynes ordered on August 9, 2013 after Sean Boushie attempted to murder Bill. The statute on temporary orders of protection is MCA 40-15-102, which clearly states: (5) A petitioner is eligible for an order of protection whether or not: (a) the petitioner reports the abuse to law enforcement; (b) charges are filed; or (c) the petitioner participates in a criminal prosecution. A Montana district court "judge" may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but a Fifth Grader (from any state but Montana) reading the statute would see and understand this.
Now he comes up with this ridiculous order to block the dismissal of one of the bogus charges. Once again, even a Montana judge should be able to read a statute and review a case and comprehend what it says. Bill Windsor believes Judge James A. Haynes is intelligent, just not smart enough to come up with a better way to camouflage his corruption or maybe he simply realizes that his corrupt bretheren will cover for him so he doesn't have to think. One thing is crystal clear: Judge James A. Haynes is a corrupt judge.
This is everything that is said on the limitations issue in State v. Moga:
Section 45-1-205(2)(b), MCA, provides that a prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within one year after the offense is committed. The Jefferson County DUI charge against Moga was based on events of March 13, 1997, but the amended information charging Moga with misdemeanor DUI was not filed until April 14, 1998. Moga argues that the misdemeanor DUI charge against him in Jefferson County should have been dismissed for untimeliness pursuant to § 45-1-205(2)(b), MCA.
In so arguing, Moga relies upon this Court's opinion in State v. Larson (1989), 240 Mont. 203, 783 P.2d 416. In that case, the criminal offenses at issue occurred in October 1985. No charges were filed, however, until February 1988. At trial, the court reduced a theft charge from felony to misdemeanor after receiving evidence of the value of the items taken. In our opinion upholding the conviction, we stated, "[a]s a general rule, a defendant may not be convicted of a lesser included offense when the statute of limitations has run on that offense but not on the larger offense charged." Larson, 240 Mont. at 205, 783 P.2d at 417, citing the Criminal Law Commission Comments to § 45-1-205, MCA. The Court's decision did not follow from that statement, however. Instead, we ruled that because the defendant had failed to bring this claim in the district court, he was barred from bringing it on appeal. Larson, 240 Mont. at 206, 783 P.2d at 417-18.
Moreover, there are important factual differences between this case and Larson. In the present case, the first Jefferson County information was filed on April 7, 1997. Subsection (8) of § 45-1-205, MCA, provides that a prosecution is commenced when an indictment is found or an information or complaint is filed. The running of the statute of limitations is tolled when a prosecution is pending against the offender for the same conduct. Section 45-1-206(3), MCA.
We conclude that the Jefferson County prosecution against Moga was commenced and began to toll the statute of limitations when the original information was filed on April 7, 1997, well within the statute of limitations for misdemeanors. The amendment of the Jefferson County information did not retroactively deprive the District Court of jurisdiction based on the statute of limitations for misdemeanor offenses. We hold that the Fifth Judicial District Court did not err in denying Moga's motion to dismiss because of time limitations.
Bill Windsor will be doing a special filming after the trial in Missoula. He wants to try to get as many victims as possible to come to the trial. Then a group session will be filmed followed by filming of individual stories. So, if you are in Montana or have friends there, please ask them to participate. January 5-6, 2016.
For a quick update on Bill Windsor's saga and upcoming trial, see this summary on LawlessAmerica.com.
If you want to reach Bill Windsor, his home address is 110 East Center Street #1213, Madison, SD 57042. That mail gets forwarded to him once a week. His email is bill@billwindsor.com. His phone is 770-578-1094, but it is not answered; messages are checked by dialing in to Verizon from a state far, far away, and Bill receives an email with the name, number, and one sentence summary of each message.
For the Lawless America videos, see www.YouTube.com/lawlessamerica. Bill Windsor's Facebook page is www.facebook.com/billwindsor1 Bill Windsor's Twitter account is www.twitter.com/lawlessamerica. "
Source
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1872:judge-james-a-haynes-of-ravalli-county-montana-is-corrupt-stupid-or-both&catid=159:corruption&Itemid=236
I wonder if Sean Boushie's wife will have to do jail time too? Gee I hope not, but she did lie under oath, year after year and she has aided and abetted right? I mean come on did they all think they could keep lying, breaking the law, harassing and attacking us, defaming us?
Surely they knew that some day there would be an honest court somewhere that would tell the TRUTH about it all after years of their lies, our proof and the MT authorities ignoring it, right?
Well as soon as the Montana Trial is done, the proof will be all laid out and then the Department of Justice can step in and clean house. YAY, I can't wait for the TRUTH to Finally come to light.
Surely they knew that some day there would be an honest court somewhere that would tell the TRUTH about it all after years of their lies, our proof and the MT authorities ignoring it, right?
Well as soon as the Montana Trial is done, the proof will be all laid out and then the Department of Justice can step in and clean house. YAY, I can't wait for the TRUTH to Finally come to light.
The University of Montana and President Royce Engstrom, have a lot to hide. And they will stop at nothing to hide it. The whistleblow retaliation against Anti-Corruption Film Producer Bill Windsor Continues. Transparency and Accountability are inevitable.
The Missoula Police, Missoula County Attorney and the University of Montana do NOTHING about Rape and do NOTHING to protect those who threaten to KILL people.
They simply cover up crimes to support the money that comes into the University of Montana and to help hide rampant corruption in the State of Montana. Yet they spend massive time, money and resources to jail a senior citizen, an anti-corruption Film Producer, in an act of Retaliation against him for reporting on corruption in the State of Montana. As, he reported on my story of Sean Boushie threatening to kill me and Judge James Haynes refuse me protection. I had been reporting on Michael Spreadbury, a local anti-corruption blogger and whistleblower, and I was reporting on corruption in Lincoln County, Montana.
Bill Windsor reported on these stories and he had the exact same things happen to him and the EXACT same Judge. Now there will be a trial in January, we will ALL be there and the TRUTH will final come out. NO Montana won't care or act within the law, they never do. However, it will be filmed and they will be exposed.
Judge James Haynes is one of the "Handlers" in the State of Montana. He knew that Sean Boushie threatened to KILL me, Crystal Cox, years ago he denied me a protective Order. Yet another Judge in his district, Judge Robin Clute gave Sean Boushie a protective order against ME, and why? Well he lied, said I emailed myself the Death Threat, said he feared for his life.
Judge James Haynes knows that Sean Boushie has threatened and harassed Michael Spreadbury also, see we were both reporting on TRUE corruption stories out of Hamilton MT, Ravalli County, Missoula County, Lincoln County and the University of Montana Law Students, as well as the rape Epidemic in Montana that authorities as well as the University of Montana were flat out ignoring.
All this, and here we are over 5 years later and CORRUPT, Lawless, Unethical Judge James Haynes as well as the immoral unethical LAWLESS Missoula County Attorney are STILL trying to prove that Sean Boushie is a GOOD GUY, and that ALL of us are lying.
Though the record is pretty CLEAR and Convincing that we have all been harassed for years and threatened by Sean Boushie, while he was on Paid time by the University of Montana. Paid to harass us, intimidate us, find others to join him and all to try and stop our blogs exposing corruption.
It is all part of a program at the University of Montana and other Universities to pay Bloggers to harass Whistleblowers and to Retaliate in the EXTREME to try and SHUT us UP, Jail Us, ruin our lives, set us up for crimes, ruin our family connections and businesses and ALL to Protect Corruption in Montana. Corrupt Judges, Cops, Attorneys, Governors, Commissioners, Senators and to protect the University of Montana and their blatant ignoring RAPE and other crimes committed by people under their watch or paid by them.
It is CLEAR who are the Victims and who is the Criminal. Yet the Missoula County Attorney wants to keep up the Charade to falsely accuse Bill Windsor of Crimes he DID NOT commit.
Well I Say YAY.
Because the Trial will be Filmed, I will be there, taking the Stand, and so will many other people that Sean Boushie has emailed from SeanBoushie@Gmail.com - we shall see if the Missoula County attorney will keep breaking the law or if they will end up putting the real criminal in JAIL, which is those I and Spreadbury were exposing and Bill was reporting on, and Sean Boushie or if they will Jail the Whistleblower telling the 100% True Story about RAMPANT Corruption in Montana.
The State of Montana can Easily Subpoena Google and prove the BLATANT Obvious TRUTH that Sean Boushie controls SeanBoushie@Gmail.com and other emails he has used to threaten so many of us but they REFUSE.
See if they prove it then their guy is the bad guy and they eat CROW. See, though Detective Chris Shermer is a Cyber GENIUS he does not seem to know that he can ask, order Google to give the information. I myself have seen dozens of emails to me and others from that same eMail. Yet in Extreme whistle blower retaliation, the Missoula Police and the Missoula County Attorneys office REFUSE to get this easily obtained information, and why? All to set up an innocent man and cover up corruption in Montana.
Here is the Latest on the Bill Windsor Saga. Counting down the Days to the TRIAL, so we can FILM the total lack of competence of the Missoula County Attorney and the blatant CORRUPT Judge, Judge James Haynes. Oh and PROVE what is really going on at the University of Montana.
"Bill Windsor's Kangaroo Court Pre-Trial Conference was held on November 20, 2015
Bill Windsor was at the Missoula County Montana Courthouse with Judge James A. Haynes and Deputy Missoula County Attorney Jennifer Clark on November 20, 2015 for what was billed as the Pre-Trial Conference.
It was nothing more than a Kangaroo Court...
Judge James A. Haynes began the hearing by looking at Jennifer Clark and almost pleading with her to tell him the State of Montana had decided to drop the charges. When she sheepishly told him no, he became the nastiest judge I have yet experienced. There was a court reporter there, and I will immediately order the transcript, though every previous request for transcripts has gone unanswered and "minutes" of hearings have been falsified.
Judge James A. Haynes refused to even discuss dismissing the two bogus misdemeanor charges against me (Bill Windsor). So, the Trial of William Michael Windsor for allegedly sending an email to an attorney and for filming a movie will be held January 5-6, 2016 at the lovely Missoula County Courthouse in Missoula Montana. Please join me. I have confirmation of friends coming from as far away as Pennsylvania and Florida and from as nearby as Montana and Washington.
But in the second-best news of the day, Judge James A. Haynes says that the Court Rules allow the trial to be filmed, and so it shall be. So, if you can't be there in person, you will be able to watch it on YouTube, and I will have portions to use in Lawless America...The Movie.
Now, for the top news of the day, I NO LONGER HAVE TO WEAR A GPS ANKLE BRACELET. That baby was cut off my leg today by Jake at Compliance Monitoring Systems.
Prior to the Kangaroo Court session, I spent an hour with Jennifer Clark discussing the proposed Jury Instructions. It was very pleasant. She begged me several times to accept her settlement offer. I told her I would rather go to jail than agree to anything that would deny my Constitutional rights.
Jennifer Clark and the University of Montana have one objective -- to try to stop me from exposing the crimes of Sean Boushie and the University of Montana. Ain't gonna happen. I do once again feel that Jennifer Clark is being forced to pursue this case against me. It is clear to me that she didn't dismiss the bogus charges for one and only one reason -- because to do so would be very damaging to the malicious prosecution lawsuit that I will pursue.
In one of the more bizarre portions of this totally bizarre Kangaroo Court session, Judge James A. Haynes encouraged me to leave Montana and not show up for the trial.
Seriously. Because the charges are only misdemeanors, Montana cannot extradite me, and I cannot be "arrested" in another state due to these misdemeanor charges. Both Jennifer Clark and he would love it if I would do this because it would destroy my malicious prosecution lawsuit. Ain't gonna happen.
Judge James A. Haynes demeaned my friends at several points during the hearing, and he called me every name in the book.
Judge James A. Haynes said the Temporary Order of Protection was poor, yet he recently claimed it was valid for 546 days. It is amazing to me to watch him manufacture facts that don't exist, lie, distort facts that do exist, and completely and totally ignore the law. It is a mystery to me how he dismissed the three bogus felony charges against me. Legal experts tell me he did it because there was not a leg to stand on in allowing those charges to continue. But corrupt judges like Judge James A. Haynes do not usually let such things bother them.
Sean Boushie attended the hearing. He is the paid government cybserstalker who attempted to murder me on August 4, 2013. He's the one who Judge James A. Haynes refused to give me a protective order on by claiming I didn't qualify for a protective order because Sean Boushie had not yet been convicted (which the average person on the street knows is not the law). Sean Boushie was likely carrying a concealed handgun, and Judge James A. Haynes acknowledged this. He said that if I want security in the courtroom, I can hire my own private security. Seriously.
Sean Boushie is one of the ugliest people I have ever encountered, outside and in.
I didn't get the exact words scribbled down in my notes, but Judge James A. Haynes indicated this whole matter is a circus. He said that the trial will be interesting for people to "watch Mr. Windsor's antics." He said I love drama. Well, that's true. Gee, I'm in the movie-making business, so I LOVE drama.
I'd love to tell the jury just exactly what is happening, but if I did that, Judge James A. Haynes would throw the book at me. The maximum penalty would be 222 days in the Missoula County Detention Center and a $1,000 fine. I may just take that risk. In fact, I believe I will tell the jury and just let Judge James A. Haynes explode. He thinks the jury will decide I am not credible. I think the jury willl see that this is a Kangaroo Court with a corrupt judge and prosecutor.
I will be filing a Writ with the Montana Supreme Court on the unconstitutionality of the charges. The Montana Supreme Court is mega corrupt, and they hate my guts. So, I may not get very far with it. If not, at least I will have established the legal record in the case. Judge James A. Haynes laughed at me and noted that the Montana Supreme Court hates me. That is another of the few things that he said today that was true.
Judge James A. Haynes denied all of my motions, most without any discussion or explanation whatsoever. I am being allowed a total of only 20 pages for all my filings through the end of the trial. My Notice of Appeal will be many pages long just listing the atrocities, so I can't file much. Should I be found guilty, I will have my Notice of Appeal ready, and I will file it right there in the courtroom.
Dr. James A. Haynes diagnosed me as having a hearing problem. Guess I need to have that checked.
On the issue of denial of due process, he took credit for educating me as to that. I raised the issue on August 26, 2013, and he raised it on October 20, 2015, but Judge James A. Haynes thinks he's God's gift to judgeship. He's the only one who thinks that, but talk about Narcissistic, this guy gets a Capital N.
Judge James A. Haynes threatened me repeatedly during the "hearing." Between threatening me and demeaning me in every way possible, not much else was done. He indicated that he has been reading a lot of material that isn't part of the case. That is, of course, most improper, but no one will do anything about it."
Source and lot's more
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1855:bill-windsors-kangaroo-court-pre-trial-conference-was-held-on-november-20-2015&catid=158:news&Itemid=236
Also Check Out
http://lawlessamerica.com/
AND
Missoula Municipal Court Judge Sam Warren unlawfully restrained Bill Windsor for 546 days in a plot to get him
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1810:missoula-municipal-court-judge-sam-warren-unlawfully-restrained-bill-windsor-for-546-days-in-a-plot-to-get-him&catid=158:news&Itemid=236
They simply cover up crimes to support the money that comes into the University of Montana and to help hide rampant corruption in the State of Montana. Yet they spend massive time, money and resources to jail a senior citizen, an anti-corruption Film Producer, in an act of Retaliation against him for reporting on corruption in the State of Montana. As, he reported on my story of Sean Boushie threatening to kill me and Judge James Haynes refuse me protection. I had been reporting on Michael Spreadbury, a local anti-corruption blogger and whistleblower, and I was reporting on corruption in Lincoln County, Montana.
Bill Windsor reported on these stories and he had the exact same things happen to him and the EXACT same Judge. Now there will be a trial in January, we will ALL be there and the TRUTH will final come out. NO Montana won't care or act within the law, they never do. However, it will be filmed and they will be exposed.
Judge James Haynes is one of the "Handlers" in the State of Montana. He knew that Sean Boushie threatened to KILL me, Crystal Cox, years ago he denied me a protective Order. Yet another Judge in his district, Judge Robin Clute gave Sean Boushie a protective order against ME, and why? Well he lied, said I emailed myself the Death Threat, said he feared for his life.
Judges should NOT be above the LAW.
Judge James Haynes knows that Sean Boushie has threatened and harassed Michael Spreadbury also, see we were both reporting on TRUE corruption stories out of Hamilton MT, Ravalli County, Missoula County, Lincoln County and the University of Montana Law Students, as well as the rape Epidemic in Montana that authorities as well as the University of Montana were flat out ignoring.
All this, and here we are over 5 years later and CORRUPT, Lawless, Unethical Judge James Haynes as well as the immoral unethical LAWLESS Missoula County Attorney are STILL trying to prove that Sean Boushie is a GOOD GUY, and that ALL of us are lying.
Though the record is pretty CLEAR and Convincing that we have all been harassed for years and threatened by Sean Boushie, while he was on Paid time by the University of Montana. Paid to harass us, intimidate us, find others to join him and all to try and stop our blogs exposing corruption.
It is all part of a program at the University of Montana and other Universities to pay Bloggers to harass Whistleblowers and to Retaliate in the EXTREME to try and SHUT us UP, Jail Us, ruin our lives, set us up for crimes, ruin our family connections and businesses and ALL to Protect Corruption in Montana. Corrupt Judges, Cops, Attorneys, Governors, Commissioners, Senators and to protect the University of Montana and their blatant ignoring RAPE and other crimes committed by people under their watch or paid by them.
It is CLEAR who are the Victims and who is the Criminal. Yet the Missoula County Attorney wants to keep up the Charade to falsely accuse Bill Windsor of Crimes he DID NOT commit.
Well I Say YAY.
Because the Trial will be Filmed, I will be there, taking the Stand, and so will many other people that Sean Boushie has emailed from SeanBoushie@Gmail.com - we shall see if the Missoula County attorney will keep breaking the law or if they will end up putting the real criminal in JAIL, which is those I and Spreadbury were exposing and Bill was reporting on, and Sean Boushie or if they will Jail the Whistleblower telling the 100% True Story about RAMPANT Corruption in Montana.
The State of Montana can Easily Subpoena Google and prove the BLATANT Obvious TRUTH that Sean Boushie controls SeanBoushie@Gmail.com and other emails he has used to threaten so many of us but they REFUSE.
See if they prove it then their guy is the bad guy and they eat CROW. See, though Detective Chris Shermer is a Cyber GENIUS he does not seem to know that he can ask, order Google to give the information. I myself have seen dozens of emails to me and others from that same eMail. Yet in Extreme whistle blower retaliation, the Missoula Police and the Missoula County Attorneys office REFUSE to get this easily obtained information, and why? All to set up an innocent man and cover up corruption in Montana.Here is the Latest on the Bill Windsor Saga. Counting down the Days to the TRIAL, so we can FILM the total lack of competence of the Missoula County Attorney and the blatant CORRUPT Judge, Judge James Haynes. Oh and PROVE what is really going on at the University of Montana.
"Bill Windsor's Kangaroo Court Pre-Trial Conference was held on November 20, 2015
Bill Windsor was at the Missoula County Montana Courthouse with Judge James A. Haynes and Deputy Missoula County Attorney Jennifer Clark on November 20, 2015 for what was billed as the Pre-Trial Conference.
It was nothing more than a Kangaroo Court...
Judge James A. Haynes began the hearing by looking at Jennifer Clark and almost pleading with her to tell him the State of Montana had decided to drop the charges. When she sheepishly told him no, he became the nastiest judge I have yet experienced. There was a court reporter there, and I will immediately order the transcript, though every previous request for transcripts has gone unanswered and "minutes" of hearings have been falsified.
Judge James A. Haynes refused to even discuss dismissing the two bogus misdemeanor charges against me (Bill Windsor). So, the Trial of William Michael Windsor for allegedly sending an email to an attorney and for filming a movie will be held January 5-6, 2016 at the lovely Missoula County Courthouse in Missoula Montana. Please join me. I have confirmation of friends coming from as far away as Pennsylvania and Florida and from as nearby as Montana and Washington.
But in the second-best news of the day, Judge James A. Haynes says that the Court Rules allow the trial to be filmed, and so it shall be. So, if you can't be there in person, you will be able to watch it on YouTube, and I will have portions to use in Lawless America...The Movie.
Now, for the top news of the day, I NO LONGER HAVE TO WEAR A GPS ANKLE BRACELET. That baby was cut off my leg today by Jake at Compliance Monitoring Systems.
Prior to the Kangaroo Court session, I spent an hour with Jennifer Clark discussing the proposed Jury Instructions. It was very pleasant. She begged me several times to accept her settlement offer. I told her I would rather go to jail than agree to anything that would deny my Constitutional rights.
Jennifer Clark and the University of Montana have one objective -- to try to stop me from exposing the crimes of Sean Boushie and the University of Montana. Ain't gonna happen. I do once again feel that Jennifer Clark is being forced to pursue this case against me. It is clear to me that she didn't dismiss the bogus charges for one and only one reason -- because to do so would be very damaging to the malicious prosecution lawsuit that I will pursue.
In one of the more bizarre portions of this totally bizarre Kangaroo Court session, Judge James A. Haynes encouraged me to leave Montana and not show up for the trial.
Seriously. Because the charges are only misdemeanors, Montana cannot extradite me, and I cannot be "arrested" in another state due to these misdemeanor charges. Both Jennifer Clark and he would love it if I would do this because it would destroy my malicious prosecution lawsuit. Ain't gonna happen.
Judge James A. Haynes demeaned my friends at several points during the hearing, and he called me every name in the book.
Judge James A. Haynes said the Temporary Order of Protection was poor, yet he recently claimed it was valid for 546 days. It is amazing to me to watch him manufacture facts that don't exist, lie, distort facts that do exist, and completely and totally ignore the law. It is a mystery to me how he dismissed the three bogus felony charges against me. Legal experts tell me he did it because there was not a leg to stand on in allowing those charges to continue. But corrupt judges like Judge James A. Haynes do not usually let such things bother them.
Sean Boushie attended the hearing. He is the paid government cybserstalker who attempted to murder me on August 4, 2013. He's the one who Judge James A. Haynes refused to give me a protective order on by claiming I didn't qualify for a protective order because Sean Boushie had not yet been convicted (which the average person on the street knows is not the law). Sean Boushie was likely carrying a concealed handgun, and Judge James A. Haynes acknowledged this. He said that if I want security in the courtroom, I can hire my own private security. Seriously.
Sean Boushie is one of the ugliest people I have ever encountered, outside and in.
I didn't get the exact words scribbled down in my notes, but Judge James A. Haynes indicated this whole matter is a circus. He said that the trial will be interesting for people to "watch Mr. Windsor's antics." He said I love drama. Well, that's true. Gee, I'm in the movie-making business, so I LOVE drama.
I'd love to tell the jury just exactly what is happening, but if I did that, Judge James A. Haynes would throw the book at me. The maximum penalty would be 222 days in the Missoula County Detention Center and a $1,000 fine. I may just take that risk. In fact, I believe I will tell the jury and just let Judge James A. Haynes explode. He thinks the jury will decide I am not credible. I think the jury willl see that this is a Kangaroo Court with a corrupt judge and prosecutor.
I will be filing a Writ with the Montana Supreme Court on the unconstitutionality of the charges. The Montana Supreme Court is mega corrupt, and they hate my guts. So, I may not get very far with it. If not, at least I will have established the legal record in the case. Judge James A. Haynes laughed at me and noted that the Montana Supreme Court hates me. That is another of the few things that he said today that was true.
Judge James A. Haynes denied all of my motions, most without any discussion or explanation whatsoever. I am being allowed a total of only 20 pages for all my filings through the end of the trial. My Notice of Appeal will be many pages long just listing the atrocities, so I can't file much. Should I be found guilty, I will have my Notice of Appeal ready, and I will file it right there in the courtroom.
Dr. James A. Haynes diagnosed me as having a hearing problem. Guess I need to have that checked.
On the issue of denial of due process, he took credit for educating me as to that. I raised the issue on August 26, 2013, and he raised it on October 20, 2015, but Judge James A. Haynes thinks he's God's gift to judgeship. He's the only one who thinks that, but talk about Narcissistic, this guy gets a Capital N.
Judge James A. Haynes threatened me repeatedly during the "hearing." Between threatening me and demeaning me in every way possible, not much else was done. He indicated that he has been reading a lot of material that isn't part of the case. That is, of course, most improper, but no one will do anything about it."
Source and lot's more
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1855:bill-windsors-kangaroo-court-pre-trial-conference-was-held-on-november-20-2015&catid=158:news&Itemid=236
Also Check Out
http://lawlessamerica.com/
AND
Missoula Municipal Court Judge Sam Warren unlawfully restrained Bill Windsor for 546 days in a plot to get him
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1810:missoula-municipal-court-judge-sam-warren-unlawfully-restrained-bill-windsor-for-546-days-in-a-plot-to-get-him&catid=158:news&Itemid=236
Detective Chris Shermer, Missoula County Attorney, University of Montana, Missoula County, Missoula Police, Ravalli County and many others in the Bill Windsor case have BROKE THE LAW. They have violated Civil Rights, Lied on sworn Documents, Failed to Protect the Public and used positions of power to SUPPRESS speech, jail a whistleblower, harass a journalist, and try and JAIL an anti-corruption Film Producer. You will all Face hundreds of MILLIONS in Civil suits and hopefully some jail time yourselves.
Criminal and Civil RICO Complaints will be filed, Attorney General Complaints will be filed, Civil and Human Rights lawsuits will be filed, and the TRUTH will be BOLDLY Lit.
Keep in mind that Judge James Haynes knew Sean Boushie was dangerous, and knew Sean Boushie threatened to KILL me, Crystal Cox years ago. These same parties persecuted me, the victim and aided and abetted Sean Boushie, the Missoula Police and the University of Montana to completely ignore my rights and safety and the LAW.
These authorities involved in the Bill Windsor whistleblower retaliation case, have a pattern and history that is easily proven and they have massive amounts of facts of who is the real danger and parties flat out lying yet they decided to jail and persecute a film producer reporting on REAL, True Corruption in Montana and protected by the University of Montana,
"Judge James A. Haynes has dismissed three felony criminal charges against Bill Windsor"
"Two misdemeanor charges are still being considered for dismissal...
I didn't have time to read the order initially. But I read the last page to learn that Judge James A. Haynes dismissed the three felony charges that could have had me spend six years in the Montana State Prison in "beautiful" Deer Lodge Montana, just North, South, East, and West of the Montana boonies. The town does, however, have the World's Largest Railroad Spike proudly displayed "downtown.
There were five charges. In Montana, your first two protective order "crimes" are misdemeanors. You have to be convicted. I wasn't, but the Persecutor charged two misdemeanors and three felonies. Not legal or nice. But what's relevant now is that I am down to two misdemeanors. This means I WON'T GO TO PRISON! The maximum penalty for each misdemeanor is six months in the Missoula County Detention Center and $500 fine. I don't plan to be found guilty of anything since I didn't commit any crimes, but I have already spent 134 days in the slammer, so eight month would be the max. And I can't imagine serving another day. That said, the Missoula County Detention Center is quite nice. The food is excellent. Their mattresses actually have padding in them. The cells are nice, and the cell doors are open to the common area virtually the entire day. It was by far the best of my three jails.
Judge James A Haynes dismissed the charges for the alleged Tweet. (Aw shucks, I can no longer hold the title of The World's Most Notorious Tweeter.") And he dismissed the two charges where Sean Boushie's name was published online in two legal documents.
He got a lot of the facts wrong and ignored the excellent law that I presented. So, don't take pages 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 at face value.
The charges that could still be dismissed are the email of a required legal filing to the University of Montana attorney and not giving Sean Boushie my TV show website. From reading his order, I think these charges will be dismissed as well.
On the email charge, Judge James A. Haynes wrote that the "TOP contains no prohibition from emailing documents to an attorney at the University of Montana about a matter in litigation. ... Frankly, the Court is having trouble connecting the allegations in Count V to anything related to protecting Sean Boushie. Moreover, the blanket reference to "U of M Staff" appears overly broad."
On the website charge, Judge James A. Haynes wrote: "The District Court... expresses concern that Windsor (or the website's legal owner) has or may have a property interest in this site.... The 'release the website' condition may have been inartfully considered as it does nothing to prevent Windsor's ongoing ..use of the several other websites and Facebook accounts listed by Sean Boushie to which Windsor has online access. Finally, Windsor appears to have the defenses that this condition is overly broad since Boushie never sought "release" in his application for order of protection...."
Judge James A. Haynes claims the TEMPORARY Order of Protection ("TOP") was valid for 546 days. No way, but that's what he says on the last page of the order.
I am very happy to say this is a big deal. What has just happened is that a lowly pro se defendant charged with three felonies facing six years in prison has won against a hotshot county prosecuting attorney. Things like this just don't happen -- to me or to many people. Judge James A. Haynes obviously did the right thing on three of the charges, and I hope he will do the right thing on the other two.
I had a feeling the order was coming because after hearing nothing from her for weeks, I got an email yesterday from Jennifer Clark, the prosecutor, saying she was sending some documents that I had been requesting. That told me that there was likely an order coming and that she knew at least one of the charges was still pending.
And if the other two charges aren't dismissed, I will get to try the case in front of a jury on January 4, 2016. That is an experience that I will enjoy immensely."
Source
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1834:judge-james-a-haynes-has-dismissed-three-felony-criminal-charges-against-bill-windsor&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236
There will be lot's more to come as Jennifer Clark and Detective Chris Shermer and the GANG have Failed miserable in protecting the public and Telling the TRUTH. The dismissals will be Just the Begining of this INVESTIGATION and pending legal action against YOU ALL.
Click Below to Read the Dismissal Order
http://lawlessamerica.com/images/stories/montana/DC-14-509/dc-14-509-order-counts-i-ii-iv-dismissed-2015-10-30.pdf
Sean Boushie Flat out LIED to the Missoula Police. Missoula County Attorney, Judges and the University of Montana have done nothing for nearly a decade now to protect the public. As they have been repeatedly shown massive proof by Bill Windsor, Michael Spreadbury and Crystal Cox (me).
Keep in mind that Judge James Haynes knew Sean Boushie was dangerous, and knew Sean Boushie threatened to KILL me, Crystal Cox years ago. These same parties persecuted me, the victim and aided and abetted Sean Boushie, the Missoula Police and the University of Montana to completely ignore my rights and safety and the LAW.
These authorities involved in the Bill Windsor whistleblower retaliation case, have a pattern and history that is easily proven and they have massive amounts of facts of who is the real danger and parties flat out lying yet they decided to jail and persecute a film producer reporting on REAL, True Corruption in Montana and protected by the University of Montana,
"Judge James A. Haynes has dismissed three felony criminal charges against Bill Windsor"
"Two misdemeanor charges are still being considered for dismissal...
I didn't have time to read the order initially. But I read the last page to learn that Judge James A. Haynes dismissed the three felony charges that could have had me spend six years in the Montana State Prison in "beautiful" Deer Lodge Montana, just North, South, East, and West of the Montana boonies. The town does, however, have the World's Largest Railroad Spike proudly displayed "downtown.
There were five charges. In Montana, your first two protective order "crimes" are misdemeanors. You have to be convicted. I wasn't, but the Persecutor charged two misdemeanors and three felonies. Not legal or nice. But what's relevant now is that I am down to two misdemeanors. This means I WON'T GO TO PRISON! The maximum penalty for each misdemeanor is six months in the Missoula County Detention Center and $500 fine. I don't plan to be found guilty of anything since I didn't commit any crimes, but I have already spent 134 days in the slammer, so eight month would be the max. And I can't imagine serving another day. That said, the Missoula County Detention Center is quite nice. The food is excellent. Their mattresses actually have padding in them. The cells are nice, and the cell doors are open to the common area virtually the entire day. It was by far the best of my three jails.
Judge James A Haynes dismissed the charges for the alleged Tweet. (Aw shucks, I can no longer hold the title of The World's Most Notorious Tweeter.") And he dismissed the two charges where Sean Boushie's name was published online in two legal documents.
He got a lot of the facts wrong and ignored the excellent law that I presented. So, don't take pages 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 at face value.
The charges that could still be dismissed are the email of a required legal filing to the University of Montana attorney and not giving Sean Boushie my TV show website. From reading his order, I think these charges will be dismissed as well.
On the email charge, Judge James A. Haynes wrote that the "TOP contains no prohibition from emailing documents to an attorney at the University of Montana about a matter in litigation. ... Frankly, the Court is having trouble connecting the allegations in Count V to anything related to protecting Sean Boushie. Moreover, the blanket reference to "U of M Staff" appears overly broad."
On the website charge, Judge James A. Haynes wrote: "The District Court... expresses concern that Windsor (or the website's legal owner) has or may have a property interest in this site.... The 'release the website' condition may have been inartfully considered as it does nothing to prevent Windsor's ongoing ..use of the several other websites and Facebook accounts listed by Sean Boushie to which Windsor has online access. Finally, Windsor appears to have the defenses that this condition is overly broad since Boushie never sought "release" in his application for order of protection...."
Judge James A. Haynes claims the TEMPORARY Order of Protection ("TOP") was valid for 546 days. No way, but that's what he says on the last page of the order.
I am very happy to say this is a big deal. What has just happened is that a lowly pro se defendant charged with three felonies facing six years in prison has won against a hotshot county prosecuting attorney. Things like this just don't happen -- to me or to many people. Judge James A. Haynes obviously did the right thing on three of the charges, and I hope he will do the right thing on the other two.
I had a feeling the order was coming because after hearing nothing from her for weeks, I got an email yesterday from Jennifer Clark, the prosecutor, saying she was sending some documents that I had been requesting. That told me that there was likely an order coming and that she knew at least one of the charges was still pending.
And if the other two charges aren't dismissed, I will get to try the case in front of a jury on January 4, 2016. That is an experience that I will enjoy immensely."
Source
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1834:judge-james-a-haynes-has-dismissed-three-felony-criminal-charges-against-bill-windsor&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236
There will be lot's more to come as Jennifer Clark and Detective Chris Shermer and the GANG have Failed miserable in protecting the public and Telling the TRUTH. The dismissals will be Just the Begining of this INVESTIGATION and pending legal action against YOU ALL.
Click Below to Read the Dismissal Order
http://lawlessamerica.com/images/stories/montana/DC-14-509/dc-14-509-order-counts-i-ii-iv-dismissed-2015-10-30.pdf
Sean Boushie Flat out LIED to the Missoula Police. Missoula County Attorney, Judges and the University of Montana have done nothing for nearly a decade now to protect the public. As they have been repeatedly shown massive proof by Bill Windsor, Michael Spreadbury and Crystal Cox (me).
Montana Corruption Cover up Continues. But will NOT go Unreported.
Felony Tweeting; Facing Prison for Tweeting - Update from Bill Windsor September 13, 2015; the State of Montana uses Protective Orders to Suppress Speech of those who expose Corruption in Montana. The State of Montana will do whatever it takes to SILENCE anti-corruption bloggers, journalists.
The Bill Windsor case is a clear violation of Human Rights, Civil Rights, Constitutional Rights, Ethics and Law. And all to chill speech, to suppress speech, to violate First Amendment rights, and to hide decades if not centuries of massive evil, dirty dealings, oppression, crime and corruption in the State of Montana done by Judges, Cops, Detectives, the Supreme Court, County Attorneys, the University of Montana and many more divisions of law and state governing bodies.
The Bill Windsor case documents massive corruption in the State of Montana like no other case and it will trickle down to massive amounts of cases in Montana where these same folks violated people's Civil and Human rights to do just as the please, without consideration of law, ethics, REAL Montana Values, and constitutional rights.
These Montana Law Enforcement, Montana Judges, Montana Cops and Detectives, and all involved in this case have done something so massively evil here. As the right to speak, the right to not be threatened to be killed, and the right to tell the TRUTH has been seriously violated.
Bill Windsor has a HUGE, Clear and Convincing Civil Rights case against the State of Montana, State of Idaho, Ravalli County Montana, Missoula County Montana, Sean Boushie, the University of Montana, Royce Engstrom personally an professionally, Jennifer Clark personally and professionally, Chris Shermer personally and professionally, Judge Jim Haynes personally and professionally, the Missoula County Attorney office, the Missoula County Police and many MANY more.
And the all did so with willful intent to maliciously harm Bill Windsor and with full knowledge of what they were doing. As these exact same people and governing bodies as well as the University of Montana did this to me Crystal Cox when I was reporting on Peter Pilkey and Michael Spreadbury exposing corruption in Hamilton Montana and reporting on the historical recall efforts in Lincoln County Montana to recall Sheriff Darrel Anderson, as well as rampant corruption in Lincoln County Montana.
All those I allege are guilty of Civil Rights Violations against Bill Windsor, did so with malicious intent. The record clearly shows they did the same thing to Michael Spreadbury, Montana Investigative Blogger and to Crystal Cox, myself. They knew all this was happening long before Bill Windsor and deliberately violated his Civil Rights in Extreme Retaliation for him exposing their corrupt, unethical and unconstitutional actions.
There is pattern and history and I believe also RICO claims to be made against all of the above.
Bill Windsor is liberating massive victims of all kinds of corruption, violence and oppression in the State of Montana.
I, Crystal Cox, went as far as I could and to go further would have faced false imprisonment, violence to me and possibly even death as threatened to me. I lost everything I knew to be my life, as did anyone who believed in me or cared about me. The amount of people connected to this is staggering and Bill Windsor is redeeming us all with the Truth.
What happened to me with these same people changed the course of my life forever and put me under years of torture and duress and massive economic loss, family loss, friends and more as I stood against them best I could for as long as I could.
What happened to Michael Spreadbury with these SAME people and entities changed the course of his life forever and put him under massive hardship for simply doing the right thing.
Michael Spreadbury is a very good investigative reporter, a strong and smart man, an educated man, and a man of true justice. He stood against all odds against all of these folks and they caused him massive harm year after year. They violated Michael Spreadbury's civil rights to the extreme.
Bill Windsor, a man with a big heart, smart mind, incredible follow through and focus, creative, bold, altruistic and lot's of moxy, rode in on a white horse and breathed life into something that was about to take the lives of many that he may never know, including myself.
Bill Windsor is a hero to me, he always will be. And he is a Hero to every citizen in Montana, whether they know or not. As a 4th generation Montanan, I wept deeply at what was happening to people, to victims of these same people for decades. And as I attempted to report their story, I was retaliated against and eventually left my home town, my state, my people to save my life from these very people.
Bill speaks for all who cannot. He is giving voice to voiceless he may never personally know. And for all those victims of rape, corruption, violence in the state of Montana, Bill Windsor has brought hope.
Those who personally know me know that I am deeply spiritual and I tell you what Bill Windsor was an answer to my prayers, and to the prayers of so many fighting for their life against the Wall of Corruption in the State of Montana. Bill Windsor is of the light, a man of great Holiness sent to help us by the Great Spirit. A man of White Light, Healing, and a powerful spiritual warrior and messenger standing for us all and against the most extreme of odds.
Corruption and being powerless in corrupt courts though you have stacks of proof is something that take a huge toll on our soul, brings a great darkness and grief that can only be understood by those who have lived it. It is intensely spiritual to bring light to this people by creating a path for them to come out of the dark. Bill Windsor has done this.
Bill Windsor's case makes a beautiful passage of light for all victims in the State of Montana to STAND Up, Fight Back, and perservere against extreme retaliation and corruption.
Victims of Domestic Violence, rape victims, victims of economic terrorism whereby if you don't do as the corrupt official say then you lose your job or way to make a money and are usually ran out of town, victims of all manner of crimes, civil rights and human rights violations who simply had no rights at all until the Internet and they could tell their story. However, the State of Montana found a way to actually DELETE the First Amendment rights, and they did this for years upon years with unethical, illegal and unconstitutional protective orders.
Also Check out
http://missoulacountyattorney.blogspot.com/
http://www.LawlessAmerica.com/
http://ChrisShermer.blogspot.com/
http://montanacorruption.blogspot.com/
The Bill Windsor case documents massive corruption in the State of Montana like no other case and it will trickle down to massive amounts of cases in Montana where these same folks violated people's Civil and Human rights to do just as the please, without consideration of law, ethics, REAL Montana Values, and constitutional rights.
These Montana Law Enforcement, Montana Judges, Montana Cops and Detectives, and all involved in this case have done something so massively evil here. As the right to speak, the right to not be threatened to be killed, and the right to tell the TRUTH has been seriously violated.
Bill Windsor has a HUGE, Clear and Convincing Civil Rights case against the State of Montana, State of Idaho, Ravalli County Montana, Missoula County Montana, Sean Boushie, the University of Montana, Royce Engstrom personally an professionally, Jennifer Clark personally and professionally, Chris Shermer personally and professionally, Judge Jim Haynes personally and professionally, the Missoula County Attorney office, the Missoula County Police and many MANY more.
And the all did so with willful intent to maliciously harm Bill Windsor and with full knowledge of what they were doing. As these exact same people and governing bodies as well as the University of Montana did this to me Crystal Cox when I was reporting on Peter Pilkey and Michael Spreadbury exposing corruption in Hamilton Montana and reporting on the historical recall efforts in Lincoln County Montana to recall Sheriff Darrel Anderson, as well as rampant corruption in Lincoln County Montana.
All those I allege are guilty of Civil Rights Violations against Bill Windsor, did so with malicious intent. The record clearly shows they did the same thing to Michael Spreadbury, Montana Investigative Blogger and to Crystal Cox, myself. They knew all this was happening long before Bill Windsor and deliberately violated his Civil Rights in Extreme Retaliation for him exposing their corrupt, unethical and unconstitutional actions.
There is pattern and history and I believe also RICO claims to be made against all of the above.
Bill Windsor is liberating massive victims of all kinds of corruption, violence and oppression in the State of Montana.
I, Crystal Cox, went as far as I could and to go further would have faced false imprisonment, violence to me and possibly even death as threatened to me. I lost everything I knew to be my life, as did anyone who believed in me or cared about me. The amount of people connected to this is staggering and Bill Windsor is redeeming us all with the Truth.
What happened to me with these same people changed the course of my life forever and put me under years of torture and duress and massive economic loss, family loss, friends and more as I stood against them best I could for as long as I could.
What happened to Michael Spreadbury with these SAME people and entities changed the course of his life forever and put him under massive hardship for simply doing the right thing.
Michael Spreadbury is a very good investigative reporter, a strong and smart man, an educated man, and a man of true justice. He stood against all odds against all of these folks and they caused him massive harm year after year. They violated Michael Spreadbury's civil rights to the extreme.
Bill Windsor, a man with a big heart, smart mind, incredible follow through and focus, creative, bold, altruistic and lot's of moxy, rode in on a white horse and breathed life into something that was about to take the lives of many that he may never know, including myself.
Bill Windsor is a hero to me, he always will be. And he is a Hero to every citizen in Montana, whether they know or not. As a 4th generation Montanan, I wept deeply at what was happening to people, to victims of these same people for decades. And as I attempted to report their story, I was retaliated against and eventually left my home town, my state, my people to save my life from these very people.
Bill speaks for all who cannot. He is giving voice to voiceless he may never personally know. And for all those victims of rape, corruption, violence in the state of Montana, Bill Windsor has brought hope.
Those who personally know me know that I am deeply spiritual and I tell you what Bill Windsor was an answer to my prayers, and to the prayers of so many fighting for their life against the Wall of Corruption in the State of Montana. Bill Windsor is of the light, a man of great Holiness sent to help us by the Great Spirit. A man of White Light, Healing, and a powerful spiritual warrior and messenger standing for us all and against the most extreme of odds.
Corruption and being powerless in corrupt courts though you have stacks of proof is something that take a huge toll on our soul, brings a great darkness and grief that can only be understood by those who have lived it. It is intensely spiritual to bring light to this people by creating a path for them to come out of the dark. Bill Windsor has done this.
Bill Windsor's case makes a beautiful passage of light for all victims in the State of Montana to STAND Up, Fight Back, and perservere against extreme retaliation and corruption.
Victims of Domestic Violence, rape victims, victims of economic terrorism whereby if you don't do as the corrupt official say then you lose your job or way to make a money and are usually ran out of town, victims of all manner of crimes, civil rights and human rights violations who simply had no rights at all until the Internet and they could tell their story. However, the State of Montana found a way to actually DELETE the First Amendment rights, and they did this for years upon years with unethical, illegal and unconstitutional protective orders.
Take a Look at Bill Windsors recent update on all this and some back story.
Also Check out
http://missoulacountyattorney.blogspot.com/
http://www.LawlessAmerica.com/
http://ChrisShermer.blogspot.com/
http://montanacorruption.blogspot.com/
The State of Montana Unethically, Unconstitutionally, and illegally uses PROTECTIVE orders to flat out STOP the flow of information, to STOP anti-corruption bloggers and to aid and abet corruption in Montana. The Bill Windsor Case is nationally highlighting what the State of Montana does to it's prey (those who dare to tell the Truth about Montana corruption).
The State of Montana is acting completely outside of law and the constitution of the United States of America and this is not the first time.
The State of Montana does this SAME THING, this same way to any blogger who dares to expose corruption in the State of Montana.
Blogging is a constitutionally protected activity, yet Montana courts uses unconstitutional protective orders to shut down blogs, stop tweet and STOP the flow of information online that reports on corruption in Government in the State of Montana.
The State of Montana all parties should be indicted and sued in civil court as well to expose this behavior and to STOP it from happening from this day forward as well as paying large amounts of money in judgments against them for who the State of Montana has selectively prosecuted and whose human rights they have violated in the past to protect corruption in the State of Montana and to protect the University of Montana.
"TV CREW IS SEEKING PERMISSION FROM JUDGE JAMES A. HAYNES TO FILM THE FELONY TWEETING TRIAL OF WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
I was approached last week by a TV crew that wanted to know if I would support their efforts to film my trial. I told them I would be delighted.
I understand the producer is preparing to file a motion seeking approval. Here is some of what was shared with me:
"The Defendant, Mr. William Windsor, is documenting public corruption, and he has done an excellent job at it. For the last three years, he has documented and shown corruption at all levels of Government, and that apparently has made him a target by those in Government, particularly those who are engaged in mal acts.
"I am concerned with what I am seeing in this case. Mr. Windsor is apparently being prosecuted for a tweet made on Twitter? My education in Law School seems to tell me that this is an issue that is clearly protected under the First Amendment. Why this is even being prosecuted is beyond me other than as retaliation.
"Further, Mr. Windsor has demonstrated that there is a reasonable chance he was not the person who even sent the tweet (which again is protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution). So, it's questionable whether probable cause even exists. In fact, it's a likely violation of the First Amendment.
"I have read some of the information that Mr. Windsor has provided on Sean Boushie. I am concerned about the actions of Mr. Boushie which include countless threats against Bill Windsor and his actions which amount to flagrant intimidation and retaliatory statements to Mr. Windsor.
According to the facts stated by Mr. Windsor, it appears that on occasions Mr. Boushie has suggested that he was going to kill Mr. Windsor or has outright said he would.
"It appears that several Montana Courts have overlooked these allegations and have not even held a hearing into the validity of the allegations that Mr. Windsor has raised. If all that I have read is true, it would appear that the Courts have no interest in curbing this behavior by Mr. Boushie.
Again, at no point in time has the Court acknowledged this or taken judicial notice of the allegations by Mr. Windsor. This is outrageous.
"So, it appears that Mr. Windsor is being prosecuted to assault Mr. Windsor and/or protect Mr. Boushie, and justice is not the end game. This is one of the pure instances in which a camera is certainly needed.
"The Defendant in this case needs a fair trial, and it is well-established that videotaping a trial keeps people more honest.
"This is a significant case. What seems to be at stake here is not only Mr. Windsor and his livelihood, but the many hundreds, if not thousands, of people he has videotaped over the years.
If he loses his case, then their ability to have their stories told to a wider audience will likely be affected. This is a sad state of affairs that many tax-paying Americans have been harmed due to the actions of government actors, and it appears that someone wanting to fix this great injustice is going to be attacked to keep this from being made aware to more people."
Source
https://www.facebook.com/billwindsor1/posts/10207968138827881
The State of Montana does this SAME THING, this same way to any blogger who dares to expose corruption in the State of Montana.
Blogging is a constitutionally protected activity, yet Montana courts uses unconstitutional protective orders to shut down blogs, stop tweet and STOP the flow of information online that reports on corruption in Government in the State of Montana.
The State of Montana all parties should be indicted and sued in civil court as well to expose this behavior and to STOP it from happening from this day forward as well as paying large amounts of money in judgments against them for who the State of Montana has selectively prosecuted and whose human rights they have violated in the past to protect corruption in the State of Montana and to protect the University of Montana.
"TV CREW IS SEEKING PERMISSION FROM JUDGE JAMES A. HAYNES TO FILM THE FELONY TWEETING TRIAL OF WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
I was approached last week by a TV crew that wanted to know if I would support their efforts to film my trial. I told them I would be delighted.
I understand the producer is preparing to file a motion seeking approval. Here is some of what was shared with me:
"The Defendant, Mr. William Windsor, is documenting public corruption, and he has done an excellent job at it. For the last three years, he has documented and shown corruption at all levels of Government, and that apparently has made him a target by those in Government, particularly those who are engaged in mal acts.
"I am concerned with what I am seeing in this case. Mr. Windsor is apparently being prosecuted for a tweet made on Twitter? My education in Law School seems to tell me that this is an issue that is clearly protected under the First Amendment. Why this is even being prosecuted is beyond me other than as retaliation.
"Further, Mr. Windsor has demonstrated that there is a reasonable chance he was not the person who even sent the tweet (which again is protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution). So, it's questionable whether probable cause even exists. In fact, it's a likely violation of the First Amendment.
"I have read some of the information that Mr. Windsor has provided on Sean Boushie. I am concerned about the actions of Mr. Boushie which include countless threats against Bill Windsor and his actions which amount to flagrant intimidation and retaliatory statements to Mr. Windsor.
According to the facts stated by Mr. Windsor, it appears that on occasions Mr. Boushie has suggested that he was going to kill Mr. Windsor or has outright said he would.
"It appears that several Montana Courts have overlooked these allegations and have not even held a hearing into the validity of the allegations that Mr. Windsor has raised. If all that I have read is true, it would appear that the Courts have no interest in curbing this behavior by Mr. Boushie.
Again, at no point in time has the Court acknowledged this or taken judicial notice of the allegations by Mr. Windsor. This is outrageous.
"So, it appears that Mr. Windsor is being prosecuted to assault Mr. Windsor and/or protect Mr. Boushie, and justice is not the end game. This is one of the pure instances in which a camera is certainly needed.
"The Defendant in this case needs a fair trial, and it is well-established that videotaping a trial keeps people more honest.
"This is a significant case. What seems to be at stake here is not only Mr. Windsor and his livelihood, but the many hundreds, if not thousands, of people he has videotaped over the years.
If he loses his case, then their ability to have their stories told to a wider audience will likely be affected. This is a sad state of affairs that many tax-paying Americans have been harmed due to the actions of government actors, and it appears that someone wanting to fix this great injustice is going to be attacked to keep this from being made aware to more people."
Source
https://www.facebook.com/billwindsor1/posts/10207968138827881
A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity YET the State of Montana uses Protective Orders to HARSHLY and Unconstitutionally shut down SPEECH that Speaks Critical of Montana Law Enforcement and the University of Montana, otherwise known as Whistle blower Retaliation and Selective Prosecution.
So there was a Made Up Tweet aKa Falsified Evidence, and there was no protective order and even if there was a protective ORDER, it SIMPLY does not apply to a CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity. WOW.
I would say that the Missoula County Attorney's Office, Missoula County, the Missoula Police, Ravalli County, the Hamilton Police and the University of Montana will be paying 100's of Millions of Dollars to Michael Spreadbury, Crystal Cox and Bill Windsor. As You see the Montana Police went after Michael and Crystal with Protective Orders in hand, to STOP them from Blogging. Yet hmmm, it was clearly A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity, and they CLEARLY knew this.
These same Montana Agencies that have CLEARLY Falsified Evidence against Bill Windsor to suppress information, chill online speech and flat out STOP the flow of information; well they did the same thing to the blogs of Crystal Cox and Michael Spreadbury, of which Windsor was FACTUALLY reporting on.
Crystal Cox's blogs were flat out shut down by a Protective Order, the man that threatened to kill her got, (Sean Boushie in case you forgot). Ya my blogs were shut down and I was not allowed to speak or blog his name or the University of Montana for a year, or I WOULD GO TO JAIL.
These same group of Law Enforcement agencies and the University of Montana, used an Unconstitutional PROTECTIVE ORDER to Shut down my blogs. Yet now we see the MT Supreme Court rule that NOT allowed, AS A MATTER OF LAW.
And this same group shut down Michael Spreadbury's constitutionally protected blogs and websites.
So Pattern and History? You Bet there is and LOT's of Evidence to that FACT.
I, for one, can hardly wait for that RICO Lawsuit against ALL OF Ya'll. Coming Soon.
So now about this Blogging as "A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity"?
Well we already know that RIGHT? Yet here we have it CRIMINAL in Good Ol' Corrupt Missoula Montana, AGAIN? Not only should this case be CLEARLY dismissed but there should be an internal affairs investigation, a DOJ investigation, an FBI investigation and a Human Rights investigation into all of these agencies Immediately. The EVIDENCE against them is mountainous and times 3, as they did this to all three of us and we all have lot's of proof. So ya, Criminal RICO and Civil RICO coming up, ASAP.
Not even a Civil Case, but CRIMINAL.
Doesn't Jennifer Clark of the Missoula County Attorney Office KNOW anything about the First Amendment? Has she researched the Boushie / Windsor history at all? Or any Montana Supreme Court cases, or say Ninth Circuit cases about BLOGGING?
Well look at this;
"The Montana Supreme Court previously ruled in Windsor v. Boushie that William M. Windsor’s blogging is not stalking and cannot be denied by any order of protection. Tweeting is a short form of blogging.
“…the offense of stalking does not apply to a constitutionally protected activity, § 45-5-220(2), MCA, and, as the District Court noted, the blogging alleged here involved First Amendment ‘free speech’ rights with which [Windsor and Boushie] each appear familiar and in which they regularly engage.” (Windsor v. Boushie, DA 13-0618 (Mont. 02/25/2014).)"
Source of above quote and Full Article
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1759:bill-windsor-has-filed-a-motion-to-dismiss-the-criminal-charge-against-him-for-felony-tweeting&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236
I would say that the Missoula County Attorney's Office, Missoula County, the Missoula Police, Ravalli County, the Hamilton Police and the University of Montana will be paying 100's of Millions of Dollars to Michael Spreadbury, Crystal Cox and Bill Windsor. As You see the Montana Police went after Michael and Crystal with Protective Orders in hand, to STOP them from Blogging. Yet hmmm, it was clearly A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity, and they CLEARLY knew this.
These same Montana Agencies that have CLEARLY Falsified Evidence against Bill Windsor to suppress information, chill online speech and flat out STOP the flow of information; well they did the same thing to the blogs of Crystal Cox and Michael Spreadbury, of which Windsor was FACTUALLY reporting on.
Crystal Cox's blogs were flat out shut down by a Protective Order, the man that threatened to kill her got, (Sean Boushie in case you forgot). Ya my blogs were shut down and I was not allowed to speak or blog his name or the University of Montana for a year, or I WOULD GO TO JAIL.
These same group of Law Enforcement agencies and the University of Montana, used an Unconstitutional PROTECTIVE ORDER to Shut down my blogs. Yet now we see the MT Supreme Court rule that NOT allowed, AS A MATTER OF LAW.
And this same group shut down Michael Spreadbury's constitutionally protected blogs and websites.
So Pattern and History? You Bet there is and LOT's of Evidence to that FACT.
I, for one, can hardly wait for that RICO Lawsuit against ALL OF Ya'll. Coming Soon.
So now about this Blogging as "A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity"?
Say What? Even in Montana? Ya don't say.
Well we already know that RIGHT? Yet here we have it CRIMINAL in Good Ol' Corrupt Missoula Montana, AGAIN? Not only should this case be CLEARLY dismissed but there should be an internal affairs investigation, a DOJ investigation, an FBI investigation and a Human Rights investigation into all of these agencies Immediately. The EVIDENCE against them is mountainous and times 3, as they did this to all three of us and we all have lot's of proof. So ya, Criminal RICO and Civil RICO coming up, ASAP.
Not even a Civil Case, but CRIMINAL.
Doesn't Jennifer Clark of the Missoula County Attorney Office KNOW anything about the First Amendment? Has she researched the Boushie / Windsor history at all? Or any Montana Supreme Court cases, or say Ninth Circuit cases about BLOGGING?
Well look at this;
"The Montana Supreme Court previously ruled in Windsor v. Boushie that William M. Windsor’s blogging is not stalking and cannot be denied by any order of protection. Tweeting is a short form of blogging.
“…the offense of stalking does not apply to a constitutionally protected activity, § 45-5-220(2), MCA, and, as the District Court noted, the blogging alleged here involved First Amendment ‘free speech’ rights with which [Windsor and Boushie] each appear familiar and in which they regularly engage.” (Windsor v. Boushie, DA 13-0618 (Mont. 02/25/2014).)"
Source of above quote and Full Article
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1759:bill-windsor-has-filed-a-motion-to-dismiss-the-criminal-charge-against-him-for-felony-tweeting&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236
Can you IMAGINE, you have to contact an attorney as a matter of law. A University of Montana attorney, and then you go to jail for alleged violations of a non-existence protective order?
"Bill Windsor has filed a motion to dismiss the criminal charge against him for an email to an attorney.
As far as William M. Windsor knows, he may be the only person ever criminally prosecuted for communication of a legal document to an attorney that was required by federal law.
Yes, it is totally ridiculous, but two years in the Montana State Prison is not funny..."
"This is the alleged crime, an email sent on February 6, 2014 that transmitted notice of filing an affidavit in a federal court case in which the attorney was shown as the agent for a party.
The short story to this is that an email was sent. Emailing an attorney is certainly a Constitutionally-protected activity as well as a legal REQUIREMENT. The bogus protective order issued against me on August 23, 2013 expired. Even if it hadn't expired, it did not limit emailing legal documents to an attorney, and if it had, it would have been invalid as that would violate the Constitution and federal law.
The State of Montana has no evidence or testimony to prove that I personally sent the email, and their obligation is to prove that I sent it for the purpose of commiting a crime. That's a joke."
"FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The charge reads: “On or about the 6th day of February, 2014, the above-named Defendant committed the offense of violation of an order of protection when, with knowledge of the order, purposely or knowingly violated a provision of an order provided for in 40-4-121 or an order of protection under Title 40, chapter 15, to wit: “Defendant emailed Claudia Denker-Eccles, Associate Counsel for the University of Montana, a third or subsequent offense.”
Exhibit 24 in the folder on the Flash Drive named Missoula Montana Criminal Case filed with the Defendant’s Motion to Quash Bench Warrant is a true and correct copy of something that was sent on that date: Notice of Filing of Affidavit of Mary Wilson. This is a legal document that William M. Windsor was required to send to Claudia Denker-Eccles by federal law.
As she was the attorney-of-record for the University of Montana, a defendant in a case filed by William M. Windsor, she had to be sent this notice and affidavit.
Exhibit 25 in the folder on the Flash Drive named Missoula Montana Criminal Case filed with the Defendant’s Motion to Quash Bench Warrant is a true and correct copy of evidence that the University of Montana was a defendant, that she is the listed agent, and that she was served with the required legal service copy.
On August 17, 2015, each of the State’s witnesses were interviewed. The witness with knowledge of the email is Claudia Denker-Eccles, an attorney for the University of Montana. She testified that she received an email. She had no personal knowledge as to who sent the email other than the name Bill Windsor was on it. She did not report the email to anyone. She did nothing but advise her superior that she received an email. She never made a criminal complaint of any type. She was under the mistaken impression that the University of Montana had applied for and obtained a protective order."
Source and Full Article
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1760:bill-windsor-has-filed-a-motion-to-dismiss-the-criminal-charge-against-him-for-an-email-to-an-attorney&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236
As far as William M. Windsor knows, he may be the only person ever criminally prosecuted for communication of a legal document to an attorney that was required by federal law.
Yes, it is totally ridiculous, but two years in the Montana State Prison is not funny..."
"This is the alleged crime, an email sent on February 6, 2014 that transmitted notice of filing an affidavit in a federal court case in which the attorney was shown as the agent for a party.
The short story to this is that an email was sent. Emailing an attorney is certainly a Constitutionally-protected activity as well as a legal REQUIREMENT. The bogus protective order issued against me on August 23, 2013 expired. Even if it hadn't expired, it did not limit emailing legal documents to an attorney, and if it had, it would have been invalid as that would violate the Constitution and federal law.
The State of Montana has no evidence or testimony to prove that I personally sent the email, and their obligation is to prove that I sent it for the purpose of commiting a crime. That's a joke."
"FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The charge reads: “On or about the 6th day of February, 2014, the above-named Defendant committed the offense of violation of an order of protection when, with knowledge of the order, purposely or knowingly violated a provision of an order provided for in 40-4-121 or an order of protection under Title 40, chapter 15, to wit: “Defendant emailed Claudia Denker-Eccles, Associate Counsel for the University of Montana, a third or subsequent offense.”
Exhibit 24 in the folder on the Flash Drive named Missoula Montana Criminal Case filed with the Defendant’s Motion to Quash Bench Warrant is a true and correct copy of something that was sent on that date: Notice of Filing of Affidavit of Mary Wilson. This is a legal document that William M. Windsor was required to send to Claudia Denker-Eccles by federal law.
As she was the attorney-of-record for the University of Montana, a defendant in a case filed by William M. Windsor, she had to be sent this notice and affidavit.
Exhibit 25 in the folder on the Flash Drive named Missoula Montana Criminal Case filed with the Defendant’s Motion to Quash Bench Warrant is a true and correct copy of evidence that the University of Montana was a defendant, that she is the listed agent, and that she was served with the required legal service copy.
On August 17, 2015, each of the State’s witnesses were interviewed. The witness with knowledge of the email is Claudia Denker-Eccles, an attorney for the University of Montana. She testified that she received an email. She had no personal knowledge as to who sent the email other than the name Bill Windsor was on it. She did not report the email to anyone. She did nothing but advise her superior that she received an email. She never made a criminal complaint of any type. She was under the mistaken impression that the University of Montana had applied for and obtained a protective order."
Source and Full Article
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1760:bill-windsor-has-filed-a-motion-to-dismiss-the-criminal-charge-against-him-for-an-email-to-an-attorney&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236
The University of Montana is as Corrupt and Lawless as it Get's I Say.
The Missoula County Attorneys Office and Detective Chris Shermer of the Missoula Police either do NOT know Montana Law and the U.S constitution or they are PAID to cover up the INFAMOUS Corruption in the State of Montana.
"Montana law states very clearly (MCA 45-5-220) that stalking does not apply to Constitutionally-protected activity. Freedom of speech and freedom of the press are the most fundamental of the Constitutionally-protected activities."
Source and Lot's More
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1759:bill-windsor-has-filed-a-motion-to-dismiss-the-criminal-charge-against-him-for-felony-tweeting&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236
So Why in the WORLD does the Missoula County Attorneys Office and Dipshit Detective Chris Shermer think that they can use an expired protective order or any protective order to go to another state on Montana Taxpayers dime, to retrieve and JAIL some guy talking on a blog?
Hmmm..
"William M. Windsor never sent a Tweet.
The State has no evidence that he did.
The State has no evidence or testimony to indicate that he knowingly and purposely sent a Tweet to violate a protective order. Jennifer Clark swore to Judge Karen Townsend that William M. Windsor knowingly and purposely sent a Tweet to violate a protective order, but it was a false sworn pleading by Jennifer Clark."
Source and Lot's More
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1759:bill-windsor-has-filed-a-motion-to-dismiss-the-criminal-charge-against-him-for-felony-tweeting&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236
For more Check Out
http://missoulacountyattorney.blogspot.com/
Source and Lot's More
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1759:bill-windsor-has-filed-a-motion-to-dismiss-the-criminal-charge-against-him-for-felony-tweeting&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236
So Why in the WORLD does the Missoula County Attorneys Office and Dipshit Detective Chris Shermer think that they can use an expired protective order or any protective order to go to another state on Montana Taxpayers dime, to retrieve and JAIL some guy talking on a blog?
Hmmm..
"William M. Windsor never sent a Tweet.
The State has no evidence that he did.
The State has no evidence or testimony to indicate that he knowingly and purposely sent a Tweet to violate a protective order. Jennifer Clark swore to Judge Karen Townsend that William M. Windsor knowingly and purposely sent a Tweet to violate a protective order, but it was a false sworn pleading by Jennifer Clark."
Source and Lot's More
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1759:bill-windsor-has-filed-a-motion-to-dismiss-the-criminal-charge-against-him-for-felony-tweeting&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236
For more Check Out
http://missoulacountyattorney.blogspot.com/
The State of Montana ABUSES the power of the Protective Order to Chill Speech and COVER UP Corruption; Year after Year.
STOP the State of Montana from Using Protective orders against Anti-Corruption bloggers, online speakers, to chill speech, shut down blogs, stop the free flow of information, and retaliate against whistleblowers.
No matter how you look at it, it is unconstitutional to get a Protective Order to chill online speech in which is griping about you, reporting on you, making fun of you or simply posting your name. The State of Montana used this to silence my (Crystal Cox's) blogs, and to silence Montana anti-corruption blogger Michael Spreadbury and now Anti-Corruption Blogger and Film Producer, Lawless America Bill Windsor.
In the EXTREME constitutional rights violating case of film producer, anti-corruption blogger Bill Windsor case we see severe Human Rights violations, Civil Rights Violations and flat out lies to jail this reporter and for allegedly tweeting the name of a man who allegedly tried to kill him and did threaten and harass him for years. We see a man jailed for a Protective Order that did not exist and the State of Montana protecting the University of Montana and a known stalker, and all to cover up corruption in the state of Montana.
It is NOT lawful to use a Protective Order to Chill Speech.
It is our First Amendment right to Tweet, to blog, to report, to review, to gripe and it is not the State of Montana that has a right over our Free Speech to do so. Yet Montana uses Protective Orders for every dirty deed they want, as they can sneak in jurisdiction, they can put whatever terms they want to in the order, and they can shut up, shut down or suppress any blogger for any reason.
On the Matter of Montana having Super Powers of Jurisdiction over an alleged online Tweet allegedly from Texas by a South Dakota resident. How did this really happen?
If it were civil it would be diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C.
Protective Orders have some super power, and the state of Montana abuses that power. The power that was meant to protect those really in danger, mostly woman from their ex-husbands and occasionally men and children from woman. It was not mean to SUPPRESS or CHILL speech or to violate our First Amendment Rights but that is exactly what the State of Montana unconstitutionally uses the law for.
I do not believe that Missoula MT has subject matter jurisdiction, or personal jurisdiction over Bill Windsor in this case. Windsor was never a Montana Resident and this alleged crime did not happen in Montana, not on Montana servers and not in the state of Montana.
"Once a court determines that it has subject matter jurisdiction, it must find at least one defendant over which it is “fair” (i.e., in accord with due process) to exercise personal jurisdiction."
http://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/legal-aspects-of-property-estate-planning-and-insurance/s06-02-the-problem-of-jurisdiction.html
Yes the above is Civil, however, keep in mind that Bill Windsor will have to file diversity in a Federal Court should he choose to sue all of these Montana agencies and individuals who have tortuously interfered with his business, violated his civil and constitutional rights, falsely imprisoned him and caused him immeasurable and irreparable harm.
Believe me, the sum will be well over $75,000 it will be millions upon millions.
http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/28/IV/85/1332
Anyway, does Montana have jurisdiction over ALL of you out there tweeting? or reporting on Montana events, weather, politicians or even CORRUPTION?
Well they seem to think that if they don't like what you say, that they can get an UNCONSTITUTIONAL protective order granted to whomever you are reporting truthfully on, and then if you continue reporting, or exercising your First Amendment rights then they will come and get you in ANY state, drag you back to Montana and put you in THEIR JAIL and their Jurisdiction, completely against your will. YEP TRUE STORY.
So if the ALLEGED Crime was committed Allegedly in Texas then doesn't Texas have Jurisdiction? And if so is this not a Federal case as the alleged victim is in Montana?
There was no actual injury or actual damages, and well there was no protective order and no tweet from the defendant and no crime, yet the State of Montana pursue's Bill Windsor.
For your Study
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_jurisdiction
So did Montana use this:
"Full Faith and Credit Provisions
In addition to enforcing protective orders issued within a state, law enforcement agencies and state courts also must recognize orders issued in another state or jurisdiction.26 The full faith and credit provisions of the 1994 Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) require that every temporary or final injunction, protective order, or restraining order properly issued by a state court be given full faith and credit by courts in every other state"
How did Montana get Texas to arrest a man for posting online about Montana Corruption? How did Montana get Idaho to arrest that same man? I mean the Full Faith and Credit Provision is for battered spouses right? Not Tweeters.
In this Montana Case there was no CRIME, and there was false testimony regarding the existence of a possible crime. There was no protective order in place, yet Missoula County Montana jailed an innocent journalist, anti-corruption blogger for posting online about the University of Montana and Montana Corruption connected.
We will not let one Corrupt State VIOLATE the Constitutional Rights of us all with BOGUS, unlawful, Speech Chilling ABUSE of protective orders.
http://missoulamontananews.blogspot.com/
And
http://hamiltonmontananews.blogspot.com/
And
http://montanacorruption.blogspot.com/
and
http://universityofmontanaemployee.com/
And
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/
 |
| MONTANA ABUSE OF PROTECTIVE ORDERS ABUSE OF DUE PROCESS |
 |
THERE IS NO FIRST AMENDMENT IN THE STATE OF MONTANA |
It is NOT lawful to use a Protective Order to Chill Speech.
It is our First Amendment right to Tweet, to blog, to report, to review, to gripe and it is not the State of Montana that has a right over our Free Speech to do so. Yet Montana uses Protective Orders for every dirty deed they want, as they can sneak in jurisdiction, they can put whatever terms they want to in the order, and they can shut up, shut down or suppress any blogger for any reason.
On the Matter of Montana having Super Powers of Jurisdiction over an alleged online Tweet allegedly from Texas by a South Dakota resident. How did this really happen?
If it were civil it would be diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C.
Protective Orders have some super power, and the state of Montana abuses that power. The power that was meant to protect those really in danger, mostly woman from their ex-husbands and occasionally men and children from woman. It was not mean to SUPPRESS or CHILL speech or to violate our First Amendment Rights but that is exactly what the State of Montana unconstitutionally uses the law for.
I do not believe that Missoula MT has subject matter jurisdiction, or personal jurisdiction over Bill Windsor in this case. Windsor was never a Montana Resident and this alleged crime did not happen in Montana, not on Montana servers and not in the state of Montana.
"Once a court determines that it has subject matter jurisdiction, it must find at least one defendant over which it is “fair” (i.e., in accord with due process) to exercise personal jurisdiction."
http://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/legal-aspects-of-property-estate-planning-and-insurance/s06-02-the-problem-of-jurisdiction.html
Yes the above is Civil, however, keep in mind that Bill Windsor will have to file diversity in a Federal Court should he choose to sue all of these Montana agencies and individuals who have tortuously interfered with his business, violated his civil and constitutional rights, falsely imprisoned him and caused him immeasurable and irreparable harm.Believe me, the sum will be well over $75,000 it will be millions upon millions.
http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/28/IV/85/1332
Anyway, does Montana have jurisdiction over ALL of you out there tweeting? or reporting on Montana events, weather, politicians or even CORRUPTION?
Well they seem to think that if they don't like what you say, that they can get an UNCONSTITUTIONAL protective order granted to whomever you are reporting truthfully on, and then if you continue reporting, or exercising your First Amendment rights then they will come and get you in ANY state, drag you back to Montana and put you in THEIR JAIL and their Jurisdiction, completely against your will. YEP TRUE STORY.
So if the ALLEGED Crime was committed Allegedly in Texas then doesn't Texas have Jurisdiction? And if so is this not a Federal case as the alleged victim is in Montana?
There was no actual injury or actual damages, and well there was no protective order and no tweet from the defendant and no crime, yet the State of Montana pursue's Bill Windsor.
For your Study
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_jurisdiction
So did Montana use this:
"Full Faith and Credit Provisions
In addition to enforcing protective orders issued within a state, law enforcement agencies and state courts also must recognize orders issued in another state or jurisdiction.26 The full faith and credit provisions of the 1994 Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) require that every temporary or final injunction, protective order, or restraining order properly issued by a state court be given full faith and credit by courts in every other state"
How did Montana get Texas to arrest a man for posting online about Montana Corruption? How did Montana get Idaho to arrest that same man? I mean the Full Faith and Credit Provision is for battered spouses right? Not Tweeters.
In this Montana Case there was no CRIME, and there was false testimony regarding the existence of a possible crime. There was no protective order in place, yet Missoula County Montana jailed an innocent journalist, anti-corruption blogger for posting online about the University of Montana and Montana Corruption connected.
STAND UP TO THE STATE OF MONTANA
We will not let one Corrupt State VIOLATE the Constitutional Rights of us all with BOGUS, unlawful, Speech Chilling ABUSE of protective orders.
The State of Montana uses Radical, Unconstitutional Methods
to SILENCE Bloggers (Journalists) who expose their way of life, their culture of corruption,
their corrupt judges and attorneys, corrupt cops and detectives and attempt to
expose what really goes on within the walls of the University of Montana.
The Bill Windsor case on Top of the VERY same action
that the State of Montana took against anti-corruption bloggers
Michael Spreadbury and Crystal Cox is
CLEAR PATTERN AND HISTORY.
All Montana Judges, Cops, Detectives, County Attorneys, Senators,
Attorney Generals, Governors and all involved WILL be named
in a Criminal RICO Complaint.
The Conspiring and the Same Pattern and History to Cover up
Corruption in Montana is now, more then ever, EASY to Prove.
For more on this Story Check out
http://missoulamontananews.blogspot.com/
And
http://hamiltonmontananews.blogspot.com/
And
http://montanacorruption.blogspot.com/
and
http://universityofmontanaemployee.com/
And
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/
More Bullying, Lies, False Court Filings and Flat out Gibberish. Let's Say you are on TRIAL and could face jail time for violating a Protective Order, yet we see below the State of Montana Admitting that the protective order did NOT exist in the First Place. Yet they jailed the guy in Texas and in Idaho for VIOLATING the Non-Existing Protective Order ?
MORE Lawlessness from Montana Authorities
This Motion in Limine is a massive Joke, right?
It can't be true. I mean come on, the State of Montana, Jennifer Clark Deputy County Attorney and Detective Chris Shermer JAILED film producer, anti-corruption blogger Bill Windsor of Lawless America based on HEARSAY. Based on false statements of one man, that have been proven to have been deliberately false and based on his state word, with no technological proof whatsoever, now they want no hearsay into Evidence?? Are you Kidding.
They want no "Irrelevant Evidence", WHAT? Sean Boushie threatened to kill me, Crystal Cox, Montana Law Enforcement has known for years. Sean Boushie threatened to kill Bill Windsor, and claimed to have shot at him, along with stalking him, harassing him, bullying him and putting all of us in constant danger, all while paid by the University of Montana and "they" claim to want no "Irrelevant Evidence", WHAT?
All of their EVIDENCE, their entire made up case to retaliate against a whistleblower expose their corrupt racket is based on "Irrelevant Evidence". If no "Irrelevant Evidence" is allowed then how in the world will Detective Chris Shermer and JOKE Jennifer Clark make a phony case and frame an innocent man?
By the terms of the Motion in Limine Below, it would seem that The Missoula County Attorney has NO "relevant evidence". As they have nothing factual about this alleged tweet, they only have yammering hearsay. They have nothing that would have a "tendency to make the existence of any fact". Yet they keep on pursuing a false case against Bill Windsor.
Their ENTIRE case will mislead a JURY, as it has mislead the public, and the alleged authorities who are suppose to be upholding the law.
THEY say that what Boushie was doing was not relevant?? Hmm Bill Windsor is fighting for his life and allegedly tweets about his case and Montana calls that a violation of a Protective Order that may or may not have existed? Makes No Sense.
Behavior of Boushie is NOT RELEVANT? Are you out of your mind Jennifer Clark. He LIED to get the protective order, he provided false information in which you did not prove, and in which the protective order was allegedly given, and this is not relevant ??? Corrupt as it Gets.
So page 3, LINE 16 flat out admits that there was NO PROTECTIVE ORDER and coddles Mr. Boushie as to oh no, what he "thought"?? WOW. So there is no protective order but you JAIL a senior citizen, a reporter, for an alleged TWEET which is protected by the First Amendment?? This is a Joke RIGHT?
What ever he believed or thought or was told is HEARSAY Right Jennifer ?? WOW, have you even read a Law Book at all???
The STATUS of the Protective ORDER is NOT Relevant to you putting a man in prison for allegedly violating it?? Really?? Are you sure about that? So whether it was active or not is IRRELEVANT? WOWEE..
It is not Bill Windsor's problem if Sean Boushie got good or bad advise from his attorney, allegedly, what a bunch of hoo ha.
When a Guy, such as Bill Windsor, is on trial for allegedly violating a protective order, I would say it is EXTREMELY Relevant whether there was a Protective ORDER in place or not at the time of this alleged violation, wouldn't you? Well I guess not in the land of Corruption aKa Montana.
Page 4 yammers about Hearsay, when the entire case is the lies of Sean Boushie and about hearsay. His report to the Missoula Police was hearsay right? Or was it fraud or lies? I get so confused, I do know that Sean Boushie saying I had passed away and had some victims list I allegedly left to Bill Windsor had to be hearsay right? Or was it simply all Fiction?
Oh and the "STATE" never requested an interview with me, as I certainly can attest to all of this pattern and history. This made up case to CHILL SPEECH and coverup corruption.
Page 7 talks about criminal history of the Defendant, and that it is simply not allowed to be referenced to, WOW. And keep in mind folks in the land of corruption Protective Orders are not mutual and Sean Boushie gets them against many, and they are not allowed to fight back, to blog, to report or to even tell law enforcement that he trying to kill them or ruin their life or business.
It CERTAINLY would be relevant to know if the Defendant and or the State of Montana has done this before, hmmm I am betting they have. This is a Criminal RICO in my opinion and NOT against Bill Windsor but against the Law Enforcement, Judges, University of Montana and the Defendant, who is protected by MT judges, cops and county attorneys as well as protected and paid by the University of Montana.
MUCH More Coming Soon and Hopefully a Federal Investigation against Jennifer Clark and Detective Chris Shermer to start then on to Judge James Haynes, the University of Montana and more.
Check Out this Bull, that I refer to Above.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY19sTHlHTWxFUEk/view
This Motion in Limine is a massive Joke, right? It can't be true. I mean come on, the State of Montana, Jennifer Clark Deputy County Attorney and Detective Chris Shermer JAILED film producer, anti-corruption blogger Bill Windsor of Lawless America based on HEARSAY. Based on false statements of one man, that have been proven to have been deliberately false and based on his state word, with no technological proof whatsoever, now they want no hearsay into Evidence?? Are you Kidding.
They want no "Irrelevant Evidence", WHAT? Sean Boushie threatened to kill me, Crystal Cox, Montana Law Enforcement has known for years. Sean Boushie threatened to kill Bill Windsor, and claimed to have shot at him, along with stalking him, harassing him, bullying him and putting all of us in constant danger, all while paid by the University of Montana and "they" claim to want no "Irrelevant Evidence", WHAT?
All of their EVIDENCE, their entire made up case to retaliate against a whistleblower expose their corrupt racket is based on "Irrelevant Evidence". If no "Irrelevant Evidence" is allowed then how in the world will Detective Chris Shermer and JOKE Jennifer Clark make a phony case and frame an innocent man?
By the terms of the Motion in Limine Below, it would seem that The Missoula County Attorney has NO "relevant evidence". As they have nothing factual about this alleged tweet, they only have yammering hearsay. They have nothing that would have a "tendency to make the existence of any fact". Yet they keep on pursuing a false case against Bill Windsor.
Their ENTIRE case will mislead a JURY, as it has mislead the public, and the alleged authorities who are suppose to be upholding the law.
THEY say that what Boushie was doing was not relevant?? Hmm Bill Windsor is fighting for his life and allegedly tweets about his case and Montana calls that a violation of a Protective Order that may or may not have existed? Makes No Sense.
Behavior of Boushie is NOT RELEVANT? Are you out of your mind Jennifer Clark. He LIED to get the protective order, he provided false information in which you did not prove, and in which the protective order was allegedly given, and this is not relevant ??? Corrupt as it Gets.
So page 3, LINE 16 flat out admits that there was NO PROTECTIVE ORDER and coddles Mr. Boushie as to oh no, what he "thought"?? WOW. So there is no protective order but you JAIL a senior citizen, a reporter, for an alleged TWEET which is protected by the First Amendment?? This is a Joke RIGHT?
What ever he believed or thought or was told is HEARSAY Right Jennifer ?? WOW, have you even read a Law Book at all???
The STATUS of the Protective ORDER is NOT Relevant to you putting a man in prison for allegedly violating it?? Really?? Are you sure about that? So whether it was active or not is IRRELEVANT? WOWEE..
It is not Bill Windsor's problem if Sean Boushie got good or bad advise from his attorney, allegedly, what a bunch of hoo ha.
When a Guy, such as Bill Windsor, is on trial for allegedly violating a protective order, I would say it is EXTREMELY Relevant whether there was a Protective ORDER in place or not at the time of this alleged violation, wouldn't you? Well I guess not in the land of Corruption aKa Montana.
Page 4 yammers about Hearsay, when the entire case is the lies of Sean Boushie and about hearsay. His report to the Missoula Police was hearsay right? Or was it fraud or lies? I get so confused, I do know that Sean Boushie saying I had passed away and had some victims list I allegedly left to Bill Windsor had to be hearsay right? Or was it simply all Fiction?
Oh and the "STATE" never requested an interview with me, as I certainly can attest to all of this pattern and history. This made up case to CHILL SPEECH and coverup corruption.
Page 7 talks about criminal history of the Defendant, and that it is simply not allowed to be referenced to, WOW. And keep in mind folks in the land of corruption Protective Orders are not mutual and Sean Boushie gets them against many, and they are not allowed to fight back, to blog, to report or to even tell law enforcement that he trying to kill them or ruin their life or business.
It CERTAINLY would be relevant to know if the Defendant and or the State of Montana has done this before, hmmm I am betting they have. This is a Criminal RICO in my opinion and NOT against Bill Windsor but against the Law Enforcement, Judges, University of Montana and the Defendant, who is protected by MT judges, cops and county attorneys as well as protected and paid by the University of Montana.
MUCH More Coming Soon and Hopefully a Federal Investigation against Jennifer Clark and Detective Chris Shermer to start then on to Judge James Haynes, the University of Montana and more.
Check Out this Bull, that I refer to Above.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY19sTHlHTWxFUEk/view
YES Chris Shermer Dipshit Detective, that DOES make it a Federal Crime, so why in the world is a tiny state court in little ol' Montana prosecuting the case? Oh YEAH to COVER UP CORRUPTION.
Chris Shermer, Detective with the Missoula Police says to litigant, defendant, Bill Windsor "did you know you have committed federal crimes?" I told him I had never committed a crime. He said that by putting things on the Internet from Texas, I was in interstate commerce, and that made it federal crimes."
"Then after the last of the witness interviews for the day, Jennifer Clark turned to me with a laughing face and asked me if Chris Shermer had discussed the federal matter with me. I said he had. Then she said she had spoken with the U.S. Attorney's Office about it. I asked what they were going to do, and she replied that I would have to hear that from them. Attorney Christopher Daly who was there from the Missoula Public Defender's Office told me I would know when U.S. Marshals arrested me. BIG, BIG smiles on the faces of Jennifer S. Clark and Chris Shermer. Christopher Daly has provided a statement confirming what took place."
"Then this afternoon, Jennifer Clark filed a response to my motion that informed Judge James A. Haynes about this. In her court filing, attorney Jennifer Clark states: "Neither the State nor the police department told Mr. Windsor that the U.S. Attorney's Office was considering making this a federal case." Here's Jennifer Clark's court filing. "
Source
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1752:missoula-montana-county-attorney-jennifer-clark-files-another-false-court-pleading&catid=159:corruption&Itemid=236
MONTANA is a CORRUPT and Powerful State. There may be few people who live in Montana, but believe me the Judicial Process in the State of Montana is as CORRUPT and EVIL as it gets.
Yes Chris Shermer, IF Bill Windsor committed a crime from Texas against a Montana Citizen then that is automatically FEDERAL, as a matter of LAW right? So why is Montana State Courts monkeying around? YEP.. To Hide Corruption.
So folks, Stay Tuned as this case proves Montana Corruption at it's finest. They dig in and refuse to let go. They know they have Windsor on False Charges and Flat Out Lies yet they coddle their paid stalker and they don't care what laws they break or whose rights they violate.
There is NO WAY this should not be going Federal. So why did Jennifer Clark and Chris Shermer, Missoula County AUTHORITIES try and bully Bill Windsor and claim that the case was going Federal then in court motions and on the ol' record they flat out lie about what they said and now they claim there will be no Federal Investigation, WHY? There certainly should be.
"Then after the last of the witness interviews for the day, Jennifer Clark turned to me with a laughing face and asked me if Chris Shermer had discussed the federal matter with me. I said he had. Then she said she had spoken with the U.S. Attorney's Office about it. I asked what they were going to do, and she replied that I would have to hear that from them. Attorney Christopher Daly who was there from the Missoula Public Defender's Office told me I would know when U.S. Marshals arrested me. BIG, BIG smiles on the faces of Jennifer S. Clark and Chris Shermer. Christopher Daly has provided a statement confirming what took place."
"Then this afternoon, Jennifer Clark filed a response to my motion that informed Judge James A. Haynes about this. In her court filing, attorney Jennifer Clark states: "Neither the State nor the police department told Mr. Windsor that the U.S. Attorney's Office was considering making this a federal case." Here's Jennifer Clark's court filing. "
Source
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1752:missoula-montana-county-attorney-jennifer-clark-files-another-false-court-pleading&catid=159:corruption&Itemid=236
MONTANA is a CORRUPT and Powerful State. There may be few people who live in Montana, but believe me the Judicial Process in the State of Montana is as CORRUPT and EVIL as it gets.
Yes Chris Shermer, IF Bill Windsor committed a crime from Texas against a Montana Citizen then that is automatically FEDERAL, as a matter of LAW right? So why is Montana State Courts monkeying around? YEP.. To Hide Corruption.
So folks, Stay Tuned as this case proves Montana Corruption at it's finest. They dig in and refuse to let go. They know they have Windsor on False Charges and Flat Out Lies yet they coddle their paid stalker and they don't care what laws they break or whose rights they violate.
There is NO WAY this should not be going Federal. So why did Jennifer Clark and Chris Shermer, Missoula County AUTHORITIES try and bully Bill Windsor and claim that the case was going Federal then in court motions and on the ol' record they flat out lie about what they said and now they claim there will be no Federal Investigation, WHY? There certainly should be.
There will soon be an Internal Affairs Investigation on Detective Chris Shermer, the Missoula Police Department, the Ravalli County Law Enforcement and the Missoula County Attorney.
Internal Affairs City of Missoula; Complaint coming soon regarding the horrific civil rights violation brought by Detective Chris Shermer and Missoula County Attorney Deputy Jennifer Clark as well as a couple of corrupt Montana judges.
Also there will be a Human Rights Complaint such as this one
http://newstalkkgvo.com/missoula-sheriff-mcdermott-accused-of-using-power-to-punish-those-on-enemies-list-in-new-complaint/
Human Rights Complaint; Detective Chris Shermer is NEXT
http://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/newstalkkgvo.com/files/2015/06/HR-Complaint-final-6-1-15.pdf
Peace Officer Bill of Rights
http://www.aele.org/pobr-iacp.pdf
Building Trust between Police and Citizens
http://www.theiacp.org/portals/0/pdfs/BuildingTrust.pdf
Lot's more coming soon to this post.
Also there will be a Human Rights Complaint such as this one
http://newstalkkgvo.com/missoula-sheriff-mcdermott-accused-of-using-power-to-punish-those-on-enemies-list-in-new-complaint/
Human Rights Complaint; Detective Chris Shermer is NEXT
http://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/newstalkkgvo.com/files/2015/06/HR-Complaint-final-6-1-15.pdf
Peace Officer Bill of Rights
http://www.aele.org/pobr-iacp.pdf
Building Trust between Police and Citizens
http://www.theiacp.org/portals/0/pdfs/BuildingTrust.pdf
Lot's more coming soon to this post.
Detective Chris Shermer and the Missoula County Attorney are NEXT. The article below is no surprise to me, investigative blogger Crystal Cox who has been reporting on Montana Law Enforcement for years.
An the “Unlawful Retaliation”, Internal Affairs Investigation Complaint and Human Rights complaint will be at Detective Chris Shermer's door soon, as well as the Missoula Police Department and the Missoula County Attorney.
"The recently released Human Rights Complaint by Captain Mike Dominick against Sheriff T.J. McDermott pulls no punches and accuses the new sheriff of doling out benefits to political supporters while punishing political opponents.
The two men at the center of the “Unlawful Retaliation” complaint are Sheriff T.J. McDermott and former Captain of Detectives, now “Captain of the Warehouse” Mike Dominick, whose complaint recounts many incidents of concern over many years at the Missoula County Sheriff’s Department.
Although McDermott and Dominick take center stage, the complaint features the names of nearly a dozen sheriff’s deputies and many of the names involved are on other lawsuits currently filed either in Missoula County or Lewis and Clark County.
Below is an excerpt from the complaint highlighting the extensive nature of the “enemies list” accusation.
Capt. Dominick’s treatment is part of McDermott’s pattern, practice or policy of maintaining an “enemies list” of those who either opposed or even did not actively support McDermott’s campaign for Sheriff during the primary and general elections. McDermott has in the short time since taking office subjected at least five sworn deputies to this treatment, three of whom have worked the internal affairs or professional standards function at Missoula County since 2002. Capt. Brad Giffin felt pressured to leave when they told him his position in Professional Standards would be eliminated.
Undersheriff Clark, the former Capt. of Professional Standards, was demoted to patrol deputy, and stuck on the night shift. Capt. Taylor was terminated as Captain of Patrol and moved over to the newly created position of “Administrative Captain” to perform non-law enforcement functions previously handled by a civilian employee. Former Deputy Pavalone was demoted from public information officer, labeled “Brady impaired,” and then fired. Capt. Dominick, despite his expertise, leadership and years of service with distinction, has been banished to Captain of the Warehouse, in a remote building behind the jail, and given a low-level, non-supervisory job best suited to an evidence technician.
The details of the complaint also claim that before Dominick was made “Captain of the Warehouse,” he was given added pressure as Chief Deputy Coroner in an effort to “make an impossible work environment.”
Prior to McDermott, Capt. Dominick had 12 coroners under him, and they would rotate taking coroner’s calls, to give one another essential relief from work that is highly stressful. In January, Capt. Dominick was directed by McDermott, that he was to be on call for Coroner duty during his entire four day, 40 hour work week. During this time period he took every coroner call that came in between 6:00 o’clock, a.m., and 4:00 o’clock, p.m.
The complaint goes on to say that Dominick reached out to the new authorities for help saying that the added stress from the changes for the coroners was “killing him.”
Another notable aspect of the complaint includes an unnamed sheriff’s deputy accused of multiple sexual improprieties that Dominick thought could lead to a potential “public relations nightmare.”
Dominick reportedly went to the new authorities during the transition phase advising them to keep an eye on the deputy in question, but instead of questioning others involved, McDermott reportedly went to the accused deputy and said that Dominick was “saying bad things about him.” The complaints against deputy in question were apparently all “unsigned.” The HR Complaint lists them as follows:
The activity of the deputy centered around complaints of improprieties with females causing this deputy’s termination from two different departments, accusations of a sexual relationship with a young cadet, reports of sexual activity going on in the deputy’s car outside two different local businesses, unwanted sexual advances to a county employee, and the last and most recent: having teammates hold a woman at a traffic stop because he recognized her from Facebook and wanted to meet her.
Watch: Sheriff McDermott Responds to HR Complaint
In the final paragraphs of the complaint, Dominick notes that he is the “highest paid hourly employee in the Sheriffs office,” now faced with cleaning toilets and other menial tasks while the Captain of Detectives position stays empty. In a final appeal, he asks the Human Rights Bureau to investigate and “enjoin McDermott and the County of Missoula from discriminating and retaliating against others like him in the Sheriffs Office who might disagree with McDermott’s politics.”
Human Rights Complaint
Source
http://newstalkkgvo.com/missoula-sheriff-mcdermott-accused-of-using-power-to-punish-those-on-enemies-list-in-new-complaint/
"The recently released Human Rights Complaint by Captain Mike Dominick against Sheriff T.J. McDermott pulls no punches and accuses the new sheriff of doling out benefits to political supporters while punishing political opponents.
The two men at the center of the “Unlawful Retaliation” complaint are Sheriff T.J. McDermott and former Captain of Detectives, now “Captain of the Warehouse” Mike Dominick, whose complaint recounts many incidents of concern over many years at the Missoula County Sheriff’s Department.
Although McDermott and Dominick take center stage, the complaint features the names of nearly a dozen sheriff’s deputies and many of the names involved are on other lawsuits currently filed either in Missoula County or Lewis and Clark County.
Below is an excerpt from the complaint highlighting the extensive nature of the “enemies list” accusation.
Capt. Dominick’s treatment is part of McDermott’s pattern, practice or policy of maintaining an “enemies list” of those who either opposed or even did not actively support McDermott’s campaign for Sheriff during the primary and general elections. McDermott has in the short time since taking office subjected at least five sworn deputies to this treatment, three of whom have worked the internal affairs or professional standards function at Missoula County since 2002. Capt. Brad Giffin felt pressured to leave when they told him his position in Professional Standards would be eliminated.
Undersheriff Clark, the former Capt. of Professional Standards, was demoted to patrol deputy, and stuck on the night shift. Capt. Taylor was terminated as Captain of Patrol and moved over to the newly created position of “Administrative Captain” to perform non-law enforcement functions previously handled by a civilian employee. Former Deputy Pavalone was demoted from public information officer, labeled “Brady impaired,” and then fired. Capt. Dominick, despite his expertise, leadership and years of service with distinction, has been banished to Captain of the Warehouse, in a remote building behind the jail, and given a low-level, non-supervisory job best suited to an evidence technician.
The details of the complaint also claim that before Dominick was made “Captain of the Warehouse,” he was given added pressure as Chief Deputy Coroner in an effort to “make an impossible work environment.”
Prior to McDermott, Capt. Dominick had 12 coroners under him, and they would rotate taking coroner’s calls, to give one another essential relief from work that is highly stressful. In January, Capt. Dominick was directed by McDermott, that he was to be on call for Coroner duty during his entire four day, 40 hour work week. During this time period he took every coroner call that came in between 6:00 o’clock, a.m., and 4:00 o’clock, p.m.
The complaint goes on to say that Dominick reached out to the new authorities for help saying that the added stress from the changes for the coroners was “killing him.”
Another notable aspect of the complaint includes an unnamed sheriff’s deputy accused of multiple sexual improprieties that Dominick thought could lead to a potential “public relations nightmare.”
Dominick reportedly went to the new authorities during the transition phase advising them to keep an eye on the deputy in question, but instead of questioning others involved, McDermott reportedly went to the accused deputy and said that Dominick was “saying bad things about him.” The complaints against deputy in question were apparently all “unsigned.” The HR Complaint lists them as follows:
The activity of the deputy centered around complaints of improprieties with females causing this deputy’s termination from two different departments, accusations of a sexual relationship with a young cadet, reports of sexual activity going on in the deputy’s car outside two different local businesses, unwanted sexual advances to a county employee, and the last and most recent: having teammates hold a woman at a traffic stop because he recognized her from Facebook and wanted to meet her.
Watch: Sheriff McDermott Responds to HR Complaint
In the final paragraphs of the complaint, Dominick notes that he is the “highest paid hourly employee in the Sheriffs office,” now faced with cleaning toilets and other menial tasks while the Captain of Detectives position stays empty. In a final appeal, he asks the Human Rights Bureau to investigate and “enjoin McDermott and the County of Missoula from discriminating and retaliating against others like him in the Sheriffs Office who might disagree with McDermott’s politics.”
Human Rights Complaint
Source
http://newstalkkgvo.com/missoula-sheriff-mcdermott-accused-of-using-power-to-punish-those-on-enemies-list-in-new-complaint/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)