"I continue to work on the criminal charges that I am submitting to law enforcement for the UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE, Missoula County Attorney Jennifer Clark, Judge James A. Haynes, and Missoula Police Department Detective Chris Shermer, and the unknown person who destroyed my trial evidence. I will file it with the Missoula County Attorney's Office, the Missoula Police department, the Missoula County Sheriff's Department, the FBI, and the U.S. Department of Justice.
I will publish an article on LawlessAmerica.com listing the 10 criminal statutes that have been violated.
1. My key piece of evidence was destroyed; a bogus exhibit was fabricated. This violates MCA 45-7-207.
2. The alleged victim (whose name I am not allowed to publish) committed perjury. He committed multiple counts of perjury (at least 20) in violation of MCA 45-7-201.
3. The alleged victim knowingly made false statements to Judge Sam Warren. This violates MCA 45-7-202.
4. The alleged victim knowingly made false statements to Jennifer Clark and Chris Shermer. This violates MCA 45-7-203. Unsworn falsification to authorities.
5. The alleged victim knowingly made false statements to law enforcement. This violates MCA 45-7-205. False reports to law enforcement authorities.
6. Judge James A. Haynes, Jennifer Clark, and Chris Shermer violated MCA 45-7-401. Official misconduct.
7. Jennifer Clark violated 18 USC 1622 – Subornation of perjury.
8. Judge James A. Haynes, Jennifer Clark, Chris Shermer, the UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE, Claudia Denker-Eccles, Judge John W. Larson, Judge Karen Towsend, Tyler Dugger, Judge Sam Warren, Judge Kathleen Jenks, Clerk of Court Shirley Faust, and unknown others violated 18 USC 241 – Conspiracy against rights.
9. Judge James A. Haynes, Jennifer Clark, Chris Shermer, Judge John W. Larson, Judge Karen Towsend, Tyler Dugger, Judge Sam Warren, Judge Kathleen Jenks, Clerk of Court Shirley Faust, and unknown others violated 18 USC 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law.
As I drive, I make notes about my Motion for a New Trial. I am filing that before I appeal. I have a whole host of grounds, but Judge James A. Haynes ignores the facts and the law, so I am quite certain he will deny it. That will theoretically give me more grounds on appeal, but the Montana Supreme Court is hopelessly corrupt. My only hope is to get into federal court. I will take it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
I am absolutely flabbergasted that someone destroyed my main piece of evidence in the Clerk of the Court's office or in the courtroom and replaced it with a copy that did not have the smoking gun. I can prove that my document was destroyed, but I won't have any way to find out who did it unless the FBI gets involved.
There are so many violations of the law and Constitution in this case that it isn't even funny. And it is all well-documented.
I am headed to Dallas. I will then go to Ellis County Texas and demand some hearings, and I will go to Waco Texas and demand some action from the corrupt Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The manuscript for Lawless America...The Book needs some undivided attention, and I intend to give it. The book will then be used in efforts to obtain financing to finish the movie."
Source
https://www.facebook.com/Lawless-America-267163020084663/?fref=t
" BILL WINDSOR IS PREPARING TO FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST ONE WITNESS - the UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY JENNIFER CLARK, AND JUDGE JAMES A. HAYNES.
I was not thinking clearly yesterday after the shocking verdict came in.
There were a number of criminal violations during the trial. So, I am preparing to submit proposed criminal charges to the Missoula County Attorney's Office, the Missoula Police Department, the Missoula County Sheriff's Department, and the FBI.
I sent this email to Jennifer Clark and Judge James A. Haynes:
"My original exhibits disappeared. I will be filing a criminal complaint.
"I will also be filing a criminal complaint about the perjury by the alleged victim and the subornation of perjury by you and Judge Haynes.
"I ask that you contact the alleged victim and secure the 300 pieces of mail that he swore I had sent to him. This is very important as you allowed the testimony.
"I ask that you file criminal charges against the alleged victim for perjury, filing false complaint, false swearing, and obstruction of justice.
"I also ask that you secure the original of the service copy that Deputy Sergeant filed.
"Last, who was the mystery witness subpoenaed? I never received any notice of a witness nor was I sent a copy of any subpoena. I need to see all subpoenas."
The UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE lied many times on the witness stand. Jennifer Clark knew he was lying as did Judge James A. Haynes. They let him lie, and I was denied the ability to ask questions to prove it.
So, I'm back in fighting mode! Got my game face on again."
Source
https://www.facebook.com/Lawless-America-267163020084663/?fref=t
"THE VERDICT IS IN AT THE TRIAL OF THE CENTURY -- BILL WINDSOR WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SENDING AN EMAIL AND HAVING A WEBSITE
Well, what can I say? I have said that a guilty verdict would be a better ending for the movie, but I didn't want to be found guilty. I was, so the movie will end with what I hope will have audiences shaking their heads in disbelief.
I had my appeal ready just in case, so I advised Judge James A. Haynes immediately that my appeal was being filed that second.
So, good news first. I was sentenced to only the maximum amount allowed by law -- one year in the Missoula County Detention Center. Missoula County Attorney Jennifer Clark asked the Court to allow my 134 days behind bars, and he (likely most reluctantly agreed). So, I won't be gaining any more weight on the excellent food at the Missoula County Detention Center. I am as free as one can be in Lawless America. I am not going to jail.
After 845 days of being under restrictions of a TEMPORARY Order of Protection, most of those restrictions have been removed.
Jennifer Clark asked for a permanent order of protection for the UNIVERSITYOFMONTANAEMPLOYEE. I argued that there was never even a hearing to expose all the lies. Judge James A. Haynes said he believes the law allows him to order no contact with the UNIVERSITYOFMONTANAEMPLOYEE, his wife, and the University of Montana for a year. So, that's good in that after a year, I can expose this guy again. I can't publish this UNIVERSITYOFMONTANAEMPLOYEE'S name for a year.
This means the movie cannot be released for a year unless I take the names out.
It was Kangaroo Court at its finest. I was denied 99% of my evidence. I was denied 75% of my testimony. I was denied 50% of my Opening Statement. I was denied 90% of my proposed Jury Instructions. Judge James A. Haynes committed a host of wrongdoing before the jury.
I was terribly disappointed with the verdict, but not terribly surprised. I hoped the jury was upset with Jennifer Clark for the constant interruptions of my testimony, but apparently they weren't.
Based upon the facts, they couldn't have found me guilty. They must not have liked me or believed me.
I am going to publish my full Opening, Testimony, and Closing on www.LawlessAmerica.com.
At the conclusion of the trial, Judge James A. Haynes asked me to autograph his copy of my Wanted Poster. I smiled and did. I hope it long serves as a remembrance to him of just what a corrupt piece of sh*t he is.
Before the trial resumed this morning, I moved to have a mistrial declared. I cited about 10 reasons. Ignored.
To be continued..."
Source
https://www.facebook.com/Lawless-America-267163020084663/?fref=t
Also Check Out
What happened to the Staple Holes
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1886%3Awhat-happened-to-the-staple-holes-bill-windsor-to-file-criminal-complaint&catid=159%3Acorruption&Itemid=236
Judge Haynes issues Order ... contempt of court
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1885%3Ajudge-james-a-haynes-issues-an-order-in-bill-windsors-criminal-case-making-it-contempt-of-court-to-reveal-juror-information&catid=158%3Anews&Itemid=236
Windsor Criminal Trial
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1884%3Abill-windsors-criminal-trial-for-filming-lawless-americaopening-statement&catid=158%3Anews&Itemid=236
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1883%3Aday-2-of-the-trial-of-the-century-is-over-bill-windsors-criminal-trial-for-filming-lawless-americaverdict-is-in&catid=158%3Anews&Itemid=236
the Wall of CORRUPTION in the State of Montana is Alive and Well. Massive proof of Fraud, Corruption, Cover Ups YEAR after YEAR and Missoula County Attorney had a chance to expose it all in one court proceeding and instead covered it all up. WELL FOR NOW AT LEAST.
Sean Boushie continues to STALK my Blogs everyday. Sean Boushie of the University of Montana threatened to kill me and has stalked and harassed me for over 7 years. The Montana authorities continue to aid and abet Sean Boushie in order to protect corruption in Hamilton Montana, Libby Montana, the University of Montana, and within the entire Judicial system in the State of Montana.
Anti-Corruption Film Producer Bill Windsor of Lawless America continues to thoroughly expose corrupt judges, detectives, and county attorneys in Montana. As well as to expose the University of Montana as they aid and abet corruption in the State of Montana.
" Is Judge James A. Haynes of Ravalli County Montana Corrupt, Stupid, or Both?
On December 3, 2015, Bill Windsor filed a Motion to Dismiss one of his criminal charges due to expiration of the Statute of Limitations.
It is a very simple issue, a no-brainer, but what Judge James A. Haynes did on December 4, 2015 is a stupid execution of his corruption...
First, some basics:
Crime or Offense or Event: a violation of any penal statute of the state of Montana. The State of Montana has charged in writing that Bill Windsor committed the crime of violation of a protective order on August 24, 2013.
Charge: a written statement that accuses a person of the commission of an offense, that is presented to a court. In Montana, a criminal complaint is made by the filing of an "Information." When leave to file an information has been granted, a warrant or summons may issue for the defendant's arrest or appearance, so this marks the beginning of the Prosecution. The State of Montana filed its Information on October 3, 2014.
Offender: an accused defendant in a criminal case. In this matter, Bill Windsor is the alleged Offender -- the person who allegedly committed this crime.
Prosecution: A proceeding instituted and carried on by due course of law, before a competent tribunal, for the purpose of determining the guilt or innocence of a person charged with crime. The "Prosecution" begins when the charge is filed. In this matter, that was October 3, 2014.
Proceeding: a case heard and determined by a court. In this matter, the case is DC-14-509 in the Fourth Judicial District Court in Missoula County Montana. As the Docket shows, it began on October 3, 2014.
Lesser Included Offense: defined in MCA 46-1-202(9) "Included offense" means an offense that: (a) is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged; (b) consists of an attempt to commit the offense charged or to commit an offense otherwise included in the offense charged; or (c) differs from the offense charged only in the respect that a less serious injury or risk to the same person, property, or public interest or a lesser kind of culpability suffices to establish its commission. Wikipedia explains it more clearly: A lesser included offense, in criminal law, is a crime for which all of the elements necessary to impose liability are also elements found in a more serious crime. For example, the common law crime of larceny requires the taking and carrying away of tangible property from another person, with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of that property. Robbery, under the common law, requires all of the same elements, plus the use of force or intimidation to accomplish the taking. Therefore, larceny is a lesser included offense in the offense of robbery, as every robbery includes a larceny as part of the crime. Assault is also a lesser included offense of robbery, just as battery is necessarily a lesser included offense to murder, and false imprisonment is usually a lesser included offense to kidnapping. In this matter, there was only one charge: violation of a protective order by not giving Sean Boushie the website owned by Bill Windsor promoting his movie and TV expose of Sean Boushie's criminal activiites. It was not a lesser-included offense of anything. It was a stand-alone offense.
Statute of Limitations: Laws passed by a legislative body to set the maximum time after an Event when legal Proceedings may be initiated. When the period of time specified in a statute of limitations passes, a Charge can no longer be filed. The statutory specifications are referred to as "limitations." Bill Windsor's alleged crime is a misdemeanor. The Statute of Limitations is one year. This means the Charge for the August 24, 2013 alleged crime had to be filed by August 23, 2014.
Tolling: A legal doctrine which allows for the pausing or delaying of the running of the period of time set forth by a statute of limitations. This is not relevant in this case as is explained below.
Motion To Dismiss: A motion filed asking a court to dismiss a case or Charge.
Here is the Motion to Dismiss due to Expiration of the Statute of Limitations:
William M. Windsor, Defendant, files this “Motion to Dismiss Charge #1 – Website due to Statute of Limitations,” pursuant to Montana Code Annotated (“MCA”) 45-1-205(2)(b), with incorporated Brief in Support. Windsor contacted the prosecutor’s office for concurrence, and Ms. Jennifer Clark stated that she will oppose this motion and did not have the time to justify the opposition.
MCA 45-1-205(2)(b) requires that “A prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within 1 year after it is committed.” (Milanovich v. Milanovich, (1982), 201 Mont. 332, 334, 655 P.2d 963, 964.) (See also State v. Poncelet, 187 Mont. 528, 610 P.2d 698 (Mont. 04/24/1980); Dexter v. Shields, 92 P.3d 1208, 322 Mont. 6, 2004 MT 159 (Mont. 06/22/2004); State v. Hamilton, 830 P.2d 1264, 252 Mont. 496 (Mont. 01/14/1992).)
Statute of Limitations has just become a defense in this case as the November 13, 2015 Second Amended Information [Docket #157] charges Count #1 as a misdemeanor. The State indicates this alleged crime was committed on August 24, 2013, over one year prior to the October 2, 2014 charge. The original Information said the alleged crime took place on October 2, 2014.
The substantive criminal statute is MCA 45-5-626: “(1) A person commits the offense of violation of an order of protection if the person, with knowledge of the order, purposely or knowingly violates a provision of any order provided for … under Title 40, chapter 15.” The explicit language of this statute precludes any claim that the offense is a continuing one. If it was a violation as charged, that violation took place on August 24, 2013.
A particular offense should not be construed as continuing “unless the explicit language of the substantive criminal statute compels such a conclusion, or the nature of the crime involved is such that [the legislature] must assuredly have intended that it be treated as a continuing one.” (Toussie v. United States (1970), 397 U.S. 112, 115, 90 S.Ct. 858, 860, 25 L.Ed.2d 156, 161, citing United States v. Scharton (1932), 285 U.S. 518, 52 S.Ct. 416, 76 L.Ed. 917.
In State v. Larson (1989), 240 Mont. 203, 783 P.2d 416, the criminal offenses at issue occurred in October 1985. No charges were filed, however, until February 1988. At trial, the court reduced a theft charge from felony to misdemeanor after receiving evidence of the value of the items taken. In our opinion upholding the conviction, we stated, “[a]s a general rule, a defendant may not be convicted of a lesser included offense when the statute of limitations has run on that offense but not on the larger offense charged.” Larson, 240 Mont. at 205, 783 P.2d at 417, citing the Criminal Law Commission Comments to § 45-1-205, MCA. (State v. Moga, 1999 MT 283 (Mont. 11/23/1999).)
The statute of limitations is a jurisdictional issue. Milanovich v. Milanovich, supra. The alleged crime was committed on August 24, 2013 and was not charged until October 2, 2014. This Court has no jurisdiction as the statute of limitations on this misdemeanor expired.
In addition, the Second Amended information does not comply with the law. MCA 46-11-205 requires an affidavit stating facts that show the existence of probable cause to support the charge as amended. There is no affidavit.
WHEREFORE, for the reasons stated above, William M. Windsor requests that this Court order that Charge #1 is dismissed and order that Windsor has no restrictions on his websites.
This 2nd day of December 2015,
William M. Windsor
On December 3, 2015, Judge James A. Haynes scribbled an "order" in the upper right hand corner of the Motion. It says: "Defendant Windsor consistently extracts snippets of the law convenient to his arguments, and overlooks the rest. He has done so again, ignoring 45-1-206(3) MCA and State v. Moga, 1999 MT 283, 297 Mont. 1, 989 P.2d 856. This 'motion' may be filed, and this Order Denying Windsor's Motion to Dismiss is Final and requires no further briefing."
So, let's take a look at what Judge James A. Haynes has done to illustrate how corrupt judges operate:
First, he headed this Motion off at the pass. The State of Montana was not required to file a response, as the rules provide. So, Bill Windsor was denied due process. The State should have either responded that he is correct or come up with some bogus argument against the Motion. Judge James A. Haynes didn't even allow the Clerk of the Court to file the motion until after he decided whether he would allow it. Judge James A. Haynes has not allowed many of Bill Windsor's motions as this is one of the ways corrupt judges taint the record in a case.
Second, he did not issue an actual order. This is a simulated action that will not actually show up on the Court Docket.
Third, he has once again demeaned Bill Windsor improperly, demonstrating his extreme bias. Bill Windsor has never extracted snippets. He always reviews every case on an issue. In his Motion, he cited eight cases, including the only case that Judge James A. Haynes cited. Bill Windsor cited four relevant statutes while Judge James A. Haynes cited a statute on tolling that has no relevance whatsoever to this matter. He further demeans Bill Windsor by putting the word "motion" in quotes so as to mock it. The motion is perfect -- short, sweet, totally in compliance with the Montana Rules of Civil Procedure and the District Court Rules and the Local Rules, and a slam dunk winner. Criminal defendants are entitled to a fair and impartial judge. "Judge" James A. Haynes is totally biased, and Bill Windsor has been repeatedly denied a fair pre-trial, and he expects the same mistreatment at the trial.
Fourth, he committed obstruction of justice by lying in his Order, and he denied Bill Windsor's Constitutional rights to due process. He cited a completely bogus statute as his authority -- MCA 45-1-206(3). Here's what this statute says: "45-1-206. Periods excluded from limitation. The period of limitation does not run during: (3) a prosecution pending against the offender for the same conduct, even if the indictment, complaint, or information which commences the prosecution is dismissed." This statute clearly addresses periods of time that are excluded from the statute of limitations period. The statute immediately preceding MCA 45-1-206 is MCA 45-1-205. General time limitations spells out the limitations periods for various crimes. MCA 45-1-205(2)(b) says: "(b) A prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within 1 year after it is committed."
So, let's put this in terms that a Fifth Grader in a state other than Montana would understand. A "Limitation" sets the maximum time after an Event when legal proceedings may be initiated. The State of Montana says the Event in this matter took place on August 24, 2013. So, the clock starts on August 24, 2013. The Limitation on this charge, a misdemeanor, is one year. So, legal Proceedings had to begin not later than August 23, 2014. But they did not begin until October 3, 2014 -- 406 days -- 41 days past the one year time limitation. Judge James A. Haynes said in his "order" that Bill Windsor ignored 45-1-206(3) MCA. Damn right he did because it has no relevance at all. The Prosecution began on October 3, 2014. The Limitations period had already expired. There was no limitations period to run after the Charge was filed.
Bill Windsor searched every appellate court decision EVER on MCA 45-1-206(3), and State v. Moga, 1999 MT 283 (Mont. 11/23/1999) is the only case. But all it says is that (a) a prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within one year after the offense is committed; (b) MCA 45-1-205 provides that a prosecution is commenced when an information or complaint is filed; (c) the Event (crime) was committed on March 13, 1997, and the Information was filed on April 7, 1997, so only 25 days after the Event, well within the one-year statute of limitations for misdemeanors; (d) the running of the statute of limitations is tolled when a prosecution is pending against the offender for the same conduct. An Amended Information was filed April 14, 1998, and Mora argued that the Event was March 13, 1997 and the Amended Information was April 14, 1998, so the one-year statute of limitations expired.
But that argument was bogus and this is irrelevant in this case because Bill Windsor's Event was August 24, 2013, and the Prosecution began on October 3, 2014 -- 41 days past the year limitation.
If Bill Windsor was making the bogus argument that Mora made, he would be claiming that the Amended Information filed on November 13, 2015 meant that there had been 812 days. Mora tried to use the Amended Information to turn his 25 day Event to prosecution time into 392 days by claiming the commencement of the prosecution didn't begin until the date of the Amended Information. The Amended Information in Bill Windsor's case is irrelevant to the Statute of Limitations.
Bill Windsor says that Judge James A. Haynes appears to be intelligent, just mean and dishonest. But it is hard to explain how a "judge" can say that Bill Windsor did not qualify for a temporary order of protection as Sean Boushie had not been arrested or convicted. That's what Judge James A. Haynes ordered on August 9, 2013 after Sean Boushie attempted to murder Bill. The statute on temporary orders of protection is MCA 40-15-102, which clearly states: (5) A petitioner is eligible for an order of protection whether or not: (a) the petitioner reports the abuse to law enforcement; (b) charges are filed; or (c) the petitioner participates in a criminal prosecution. A Montana district court "judge" may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but a Fifth Grader (from any state but Montana) reading the statute would see and understand this.
Now he comes up with this ridiculous order to block the dismissal of one of the bogus charges. Once again, even a Montana judge should be able to read a statute and review a case and comprehend what it says. Bill Windsor believes Judge James A. Haynes is intelligent, just not smart enough to come up with a better way to camouflage his corruption or maybe he simply realizes that his corrupt bretheren will cover for him so he doesn't have to think. One thing is crystal clear: Judge James A. Haynes is a corrupt judge.
This is everything that is said on the limitations issue in State v. Moga:
Section 45-1-205(2)(b), MCA, provides that a prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within one year after the offense is committed. The Jefferson County DUI charge against Moga was based on events of March 13, 1997, but the amended information charging Moga with misdemeanor DUI was not filed until April 14, 1998. Moga argues that the misdemeanor DUI charge against him in Jefferson County should have been dismissed for untimeliness pursuant to § 45-1-205(2)(b), MCA.
In so arguing, Moga relies upon this Court's opinion in State v. Larson (1989), 240 Mont. 203, 783 P.2d 416. In that case, the criminal offenses at issue occurred in October 1985. No charges were filed, however, until February 1988. At trial, the court reduced a theft charge from felony to misdemeanor after receiving evidence of the value of the items taken. In our opinion upholding the conviction, we stated, "[a]s a general rule, a defendant may not be convicted of a lesser included offense when the statute of limitations has run on that offense but not on the larger offense charged." Larson, 240 Mont. at 205, 783 P.2d at 417, citing the Criminal Law Commission Comments to § 45-1-205, MCA. The Court's decision did not follow from that statement, however. Instead, we ruled that because the defendant had failed to bring this claim in the district court, he was barred from bringing it on appeal. Larson, 240 Mont. at 206, 783 P.2d at 417-18.
Moreover, there are important factual differences between this case and Larson. In the present case, the first Jefferson County information was filed on April 7, 1997. Subsection (8) of § 45-1-205, MCA, provides that a prosecution is commenced when an indictment is found or an information or complaint is filed. The running of the statute of limitations is tolled when a prosecution is pending against the offender for the same conduct. Section 45-1-206(3), MCA.
We conclude that the Jefferson County prosecution against Moga was commenced and began to toll the statute of limitations when the original information was filed on April 7, 1997, well within the statute of limitations for misdemeanors. The amendment of the Jefferson County information did not retroactively deprive the District Court of jurisdiction based on the statute of limitations for misdemeanor offenses. We hold that the Fifth Judicial District Court did not err in denying Moga's motion to dismiss because of time limitations.
Bill Windsor will be doing a special filming after the trial in Missoula. He wants to try to get as many victims as possible to come to the trial. Then a group session will be filmed followed by filming of individual stories. So, if you are in Montana or have friends there, please ask them to participate. January 5-6, 2016.
For a quick update on Bill Windsor's saga and upcoming trial, see this summary on LawlessAmerica.com.
If you want to reach Bill Windsor, his home address is 110 East Center Street #1213, Madison, SD 57042. That mail gets forwarded to him once a week. His email is bill@billwindsor.com. His phone is 770-578-1094, but it is not answered; messages are checked by dialing in to Verizon from a state far, far away, and Bill receives an email with the name, number, and one sentence summary of each message.
For the Lawless America videos, see www.YouTube.com/lawlessamerica. Bill Windsor's Facebook page is www.facebook.com/billwindsor1 Bill Windsor's Twitter account is www.twitter.com/lawlessamerica. "
Source
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1872:judge-james-a-haynes-of-ravalli-county-montana-is-corrupt-stupid-or-both&catid=159:corruption&Itemid=236
On December 3, 2015, Bill Windsor filed a Motion to Dismiss one of his criminal charges due to expiration of the Statute of Limitations.
It is a very simple issue, a no-brainer, but what Judge James A. Haynes did on December 4, 2015 is a stupid execution of his corruption...
First, some basics:
Crime or Offense or Event: a violation of any penal statute of the state of Montana. The State of Montana has charged in writing that Bill Windsor committed the crime of violation of a protective order on August 24, 2013.
Charge: a written statement that accuses a person of the commission of an offense, that is presented to a court. In Montana, a criminal complaint is made by the filing of an "Information." When leave to file an information has been granted, a warrant or summons may issue for the defendant's arrest or appearance, so this marks the beginning of the Prosecution. The State of Montana filed its Information on October 3, 2014.
Offender: an accused defendant in a criminal case. In this matter, Bill Windsor is the alleged Offender -- the person who allegedly committed this crime.
Prosecution: A proceeding instituted and carried on by due course of law, before a competent tribunal, for the purpose of determining the guilt or innocence of a person charged with crime. The "Prosecution" begins when the charge is filed. In this matter, that was October 3, 2014.
Proceeding: a case heard and determined by a court. In this matter, the case is DC-14-509 in the Fourth Judicial District Court in Missoula County Montana. As the Docket shows, it began on October 3, 2014.
Lesser Included Offense: defined in MCA 46-1-202(9) "Included offense" means an offense that: (a) is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged; (b) consists of an attempt to commit the offense charged or to commit an offense otherwise included in the offense charged; or (c) differs from the offense charged only in the respect that a less serious injury or risk to the same person, property, or public interest or a lesser kind of culpability suffices to establish its commission. Wikipedia explains it more clearly: A lesser included offense, in criminal law, is a crime for which all of the elements necessary to impose liability are also elements found in a more serious crime. For example, the common law crime of larceny requires the taking and carrying away of tangible property from another person, with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of that property. Robbery, under the common law, requires all of the same elements, plus the use of force or intimidation to accomplish the taking. Therefore, larceny is a lesser included offense in the offense of robbery, as every robbery includes a larceny as part of the crime. Assault is also a lesser included offense of robbery, just as battery is necessarily a lesser included offense to murder, and false imprisonment is usually a lesser included offense to kidnapping. In this matter, there was only one charge: violation of a protective order by not giving Sean Boushie the website owned by Bill Windsor promoting his movie and TV expose of Sean Boushie's criminal activiites. It was not a lesser-included offense of anything. It was a stand-alone offense.
Statute of Limitations: Laws passed by a legislative body to set the maximum time after an Event when legal Proceedings may be initiated. When the period of time specified in a statute of limitations passes, a Charge can no longer be filed. The statutory specifications are referred to as "limitations." Bill Windsor's alleged crime is a misdemeanor. The Statute of Limitations is one year. This means the Charge for the August 24, 2013 alleged crime had to be filed by August 23, 2014.
Tolling: A legal doctrine which allows for the pausing or delaying of the running of the period of time set forth by a statute of limitations. This is not relevant in this case as is explained below.
Motion To Dismiss: A motion filed asking a court to dismiss a case or Charge.
Here is the Motion to Dismiss due to Expiration of the Statute of Limitations:
William M. Windsor, Defendant, files this “Motion to Dismiss Charge #1 – Website due to Statute of Limitations,” pursuant to Montana Code Annotated (“MCA”) 45-1-205(2)(b), with incorporated Brief in Support. Windsor contacted the prosecutor’s office for concurrence, and Ms. Jennifer Clark stated that she will oppose this motion and did not have the time to justify the opposition.
MCA 45-1-205(2)(b) requires that “A prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within 1 year after it is committed.” (Milanovich v. Milanovich, (1982), 201 Mont. 332, 334, 655 P.2d 963, 964.) (See also State v. Poncelet, 187 Mont. 528, 610 P.2d 698 (Mont. 04/24/1980); Dexter v. Shields, 92 P.3d 1208, 322 Mont. 6, 2004 MT 159 (Mont. 06/22/2004); State v. Hamilton, 830 P.2d 1264, 252 Mont. 496 (Mont. 01/14/1992).)
Statute of Limitations has just become a defense in this case as the November 13, 2015 Second Amended Information [Docket #157] charges Count #1 as a misdemeanor. The State indicates this alleged crime was committed on August 24, 2013, over one year prior to the October 2, 2014 charge. The original Information said the alleged crime took place on October 2, 2014.
The substantive criminal statute is MCA 45-5-626: “(1) A person commits the offense of violation of an order of protection if the person, with knowledge of the order, purposely or knowingly violates a provision of any order provided for … under Title 40, chapter 15.” The explicit language of this statute precludes any claim that the offense is a continuing one. If it was a violation as charged, that violation took place on August 24, 2013.
A particular offense should not be construed as continuing “unless the explicit language of the substantive criminal statute compels such a conclusion, or the nature of the crime involved is such that [the legislature] must assuredly have intended that it be treated as a continuing one.” (Toussie v. United States (1970), 397 U.S. 112, 115, 90 S.Ct. 858, 860, 25 L.Ed.2d 156, 161, citing United States v. Scharton (1932), 285 U.S. 518, 52 S.Ct. 416, 76 L.Ed. 917.
In State v. Larson (1989), 240 Mont. 203, 783 P.2d 416, the criminal offenses at issue occurred in October 1985. No charges were filed, however, until February 1988. At trial, the court reduced a theft charge from felony to misdemeanor after receiving evidence of the value of the items taken. In our opinion upholding the conviction, we stated, “[a]s a general rule, a defendant may not be convicted of a lesser included offense when the statute of limitations has run on that offense but not on the larger offense charged.” Larson, 240 Mont. at 205, 783 P.2d at 417, citing the Criminal Law Commission Comments to § 45-1-205, MCA. (State v. Moga, 1999 MT 283 (Mont. 11/23/1999).)
The statute of limitations is a jurisdictional issue. Milanovich v. Milanovich, supra. The alleged crime was committed on August 24, 2013 and was not charged until October 2, 2014. This Court has no jurisdiction as the statute of limitations on this misdemeanor expired.
In addition, the Second Amended information does not comply with the law. MCA 46-11-205 requires an affidavit stating facts that show the existence of probable cause to support the charge as amended. There is no affidavit.
WHEREFORE, for the reasons stated above, William M. Windsor requests that this Court order that Charge #1 is dismissed and order that Windsor has no restrictions on his websites.
This 2nd day of December 2015,
William M. Windsor
On December 3, 2015, Judge James A. Haynes scribbled an "order" in the upper right hand corner of the Motion. It says: "Defendant Windsor consistently extracts snippets of the law convenient to his arguments, and overlooks the rest. He has done so again, ignoring 45-1-206(3) MCA and State v. Moga, 1999 MT 283, 297 Mont. 1, 989 P.2d 856. This 'motion' may be filed, and this Order Denying Windsor's Motion to Dismiss is Final and requires no further briefing."
So, let's take a look at what Judge James A. Haynes has done to illustrate how corrupt judges operate:
First, he headed this Motion off at the pass. The State of Montana was not required to file a response, as the rules provide. So, Bill Windsor was denied due process. The State should have either responded that he is correct or come up with some bogus argument against the Motion. Judge James A. Haynes didn't even allow the Clerk of the Court to file the motion until after he decided whether he would allow it. Judge James A. Haynes has not allowed many of Bill Windsor's motions as this is one of the ways corrupt judges taint the record in a case.
Second, he did not issue an actual order. This is a simulated action that will not actually show up on the Court Docket.
Third, he has once again demeaned Bill Windsor improperly, demonstrating his extreme bias. Bill Windsor has never extracted snippets. He always reviews every case on an issue. In his Motion, he cited eight cases, including the only case that Judge James A. Haynes cited. Bill Windsor cited four relevant statutes while Judge James A. Haynes cited a statute on tolling that has no relevance whatsoever to this matter. He further demeans Bill Windsor by putting the word "motion" in quotes so as to mock it. The motion is perfect -- short, sweet, totally in compliance with the Montana Rules of Civil Procedure and the District Court Rules and the Local Rules, and a slam dunk winner. Criminal defendants are entitled to a fair and impartial judge. "Judge" James A. Haynes is totally biased, and Bill Windsor has been repeatedly denied a fair pre-trial, and he expects the same mistreatment at the trial.
Fourth, he committed obstruction of justice by lying in his Order, and he denied Bill Windsor's Constitutional rights to due process. He cited a completely bogus statute as his authority -- MCA 45-1-206(3). Here's what this statute says: "45-1-206. Periods excluded from limitation. The period of limitation does not run during: (3) a prosecution pending against the offender for the same conduct, even if the indictment, complaint, or information which commences the prosecution is dismissed." This statute clearly addresses periods of time that are excluded from the statute of limitations period. The statute immediately preceding MCA 45-1-206 is MCA 45-1-205. General time limitations spells out the limitations periods for various crimes. MCA 45-1-205(2)(b) says: "(b) A prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within 1 year after it is committed."
So, let's put this in terms that a Fifth Grader in a state other than Montana would understand. A "Limitation" sets the maximum time after an Event when legal proceedings may be initiated. The State of Montana says the Event in this matter took place on August 24, 2013. So, the clock starts on August 24, 2013. The Limitation on this charge, a misdemeanor, is one year. So, legal Proceedings had to begin not later than August 23, 2014. But they did not begin until October 3, 2014 -- 406 days -- 41 days past the one year time limitation. Judge James A. Haynes said in his "order" that Bill Windsor ignored 45-1-206(3) MCA. Damn right he did because it has no relevance at all. The Prosecution began on October 3, 2014. The Limitations period had already expired. There was no limitations period to run after the Charge was filed.
Bill Windsor searched every appellate court decision EVER on MCA 45-1-206(3), and State v. Moga, 1999 MT 283 (Mont. 11/23/1999) is the only case. But all it says is that (a) a prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within one year after the offense is committed; (b) MCA 45-1-205 provides that a prosecution is commenced when an information or complaint is filed; (c) the Event (crime) was committed on March 13, 1997, and the Information was filed on April 7, 1997, so only 25 days after the Event, well within the one-year statute of limitations for misdemeanors; (d) the running of the statute of limitations is tolled when a prosecution is pending against the offender for the same conduct. An Amended Information was filed April 14, 1998, and Mora argued that the Event was March 13, 1997 and the Amended Information was April 14, 1998, so the one-year statute of limitations expired.
But that argument was bogus and this is irrelevant in this case because Bill Windsor's Event was August 24, 2013, and the Prosecution began on October 3, 2014 -- 41 days past the year limitation.
If Bill Windsor was making the bogus argument that Mora made, he would be claiming that the Amended Information filed on November 13, 2015 meant that there had been 812 days. Mora tried to use the Amended Information to turn his 25 day Event to prosecution time into 392 days by claiming the commencement of the prosecution didn't begin until the date of the Amended Information. The Amended Information in Bill Windsor's case is irrelevant to the Statute of Limitations.
Bill Windsor says that Judge James A. Haynes appears to be intelligent, just mean and dishonest. But it is hard to explain how a "judge" can say that Bill Windsor did not qualify for a temporary order of protection as Sean Boushie had not been arrested or convicted. That's what Judge James A. Haynes ordered on August 9, 2013 after Sean Boushie attempted to murder Bill. The statute on temporary orders of protection is MCA 40-15-102, which clearly states: (5) A petitioner is eligible for an order of protection whether or not: (a) the petitioner reports the abuse to law enforcement; (b) charges are filed; or (c) the petitioner participates in a criminal prosecution. A Montana district court "judge" may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but a Fifth Grader (from any state but Montana) reading the statute would see and understand this.
Now he comes up with this ridiculous order to block the dismissal of one of the bogus charges. Once again, even a Montana judge should be able to read a statute and review a case and comprehend what it says. Bill Windsor believes Judge James A. Haynes is intelligent, just not smart enough to come up with a better way to camouflage his corruption or maybe he simply realizes that his corrupt bretheren will cover for him so he doesn't have to think. One thing is crystal clear: Judge James A. Haynes is a corrupt judge.
This is everything that is said on the limitations issue in State v. Moga:
Section 45-1-205(2)(b), MCA, provides that a prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within one year after the offense is committed. The Jefferson County DUI charge against Moga was based on events of March 13, 1997, but the amended information charging Moga with misdemeanor DUI was not filed until April 14, 1998. Moga argues that the misdemeanor DUI charge against him in Jefferson County should have been dismissed for untimeliness pursuant to § 45-1-205(2)(b), MCA.
In so arguing, Moga relies upon this Court's opinion in State v. Larson (1989), 240 Mont. 203, 783 P.2d 416. In that case, the criminal offenses at issue occurred in October 1985. No charges were filed, however, until February 1988. At trial, the court reduced a theft charge from felony to misdemeanor after receiving evidence of the value of the items taken. In our opinion upholding the conviction, we stated, "[a]s a general rule, a defendant may not be convicted of a lesser included offense when the statute of limitations has run on that offense but not on the larger offense charged." Larson, 240 Mont. at 205, 783 P.2d at 417, citing the Criminal Law Commission Comments to § 45-1-205, MCA. The Court's decision did not follow from that statement, however. Instead, we ruled that because the defendant had failed to bring this claim in the district court, he was barred from bringing it on appeal. Larson, 240 Mont. at 206, 783 P.2d at 417-18.
Moreover, there are important factual differences between this case and Larson. In the present case, the first Jefferson County information was filed on April 7, 1997. Subsection (8) of § 45-1-205, MCA, provides that a prosecution is commenced when an indictment is found or an information or complaint is filed. The running of the statute of limitations is tolled when a prosecution is pending against the offender for the same conduct. Section 45-1-206(3), MCA.
We conclude that the Jefferson County prosecution against Moga was commenced and began to toll the statute of limitations when the original information was filed on April 7, 1997, well within the statute of limitations for misdemeanors. The amendment of the Jefferson County information did not retroactively deprive the District Court of jurisdiction based on the statute of limitations for misdemeanor offenses. We hold that the Fifth Judicial District Court did not err in denying Moga's motion to dismiss because of time limitations.
Bill Windsor will be doing a special filming after the trial in Missoula. He wants to try to get as many victims as possible to come to the trial. Then a group session will be filmed followed by filming of individual stories. So, if you are in Montana or have friends there, please ask them to participate. January 5-6, 2016.
For a quick update on Bill Windsor's saga and upcoming trial, see this summary on LawlessAmerica.com.
If you want to reach Bill Windsor, his home address is 110 East Center Street #1213, Madison, SD 57042. That mail gets forwarded to him once a week. His email is bill@billwindsor.com. His phone is 770-578-1094, but it is not answered; messages are checked by dialing in to Verizon from a state far, far away, and Bill receives an email with the name, number, and one sentence summary of each message.
For the Lawless America videos, see www.YouTube.com/lawlessamerica. Bill Windsor's Facebook page is www.facebook.com/billwindsor1 Bill Windsor's Twitter account is www.twitter.com/lawlessamerica. "
Source
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1872:judge-james-a-haynes-of-ravalli-county-montana-is-corrupt-stupid-or-both&catid=159:corruption&Itemid=236
I wonder if Sean Boushie's wife will have to do jail time too? Gee I hope not, but she did lie under oath, year after year and she has aided and abetted right? I mean come on did they all think they could keep lying, breaking the law, harassing and attacking us, defaming us?
Surely they knew that some day there would be an honest court somewhere that would tell the TRUTH about it all after years of their lies, our proof and the MT authorities ignoring it, right?
Well as soon as the Montana Trial is done, the proof will be all laid out and then the Department of Justice can step in and clean house. YAY, I can't wait for the TRUTH to Finally come to light.
Surely they knew that some day there would be an honest court somewhere that would tell the TRUTH about it all after years of their lies, our proof and the MT authorities ignoring it, right?
Well as soon as the Montana Trial is done, the proof will be all laid out and then the Department of Justice can step in and clean house. YAY, I can't wait for the TRUTH to Finally come to light.
The University of Montana and President Royce Engstrom, have a lot to hide. And they will stop at nothing to hide it. The whistleblow retaliation against Anti-Corruption Film Producer Bill Windsor Continues. Transparency and Accountability are inevitable.
The Missoula Police, Missoula County Attorney and the University of Montana do NOTHING about Rape and do NOTHING to protect those who threaten to KILL people.
They simply cover up crimes to support the money that comes into the University of Montana and to help hide rampant corruption in the State of Montana. Yet they spend massive time, money and resources to jail a senior citizen, an anti-corruption Film Producer, in an act of Retaliation against him for reporting on corruption in the State of Montana. As, he reported on my story of Sean Boushie threatening to kill me and Judge James Haynes refuse me protection. I had been reporting on Michael Spreadbury, a local anti-corruption blogger and whistleblower, and I was reporting on corruption in Lincoln County, Montana.
Bill Windsor reported on these stories and he had the exact same things happen to him and the EXACT same Judge. Now there will be a trial in January, we will ALL be there and the TRUTH will final come out. NO Montana won't care or act within the law, they never do. However, it will be filmed and they will be exposed.
Judge James Haynes is one of the "Handlers" in the State of Montana. He knew that Sean Boushie threatened to KILL me, Crystal Cox, years ago he denied me a protective Order. Yet another Judge in his district, Judge Robin Clute gave Sean Boushie a protective order against ME, and why? Well he lied, said I emailed myself the Death Threat, said he feared for his life.
Judge James Haynes knows that Sean Boushie has threatened and harassed Michael Spreadbury also, see we were both reporting on TRUE corruption stories out of Hamilton MT, Ravalli County, Missoula County, Lincoln County and the University of Montana Law Students, as well as the rape Epidemic in Montana that authorities as well as the University of Montana were flat out ignoring.
All this, and here we are over 5 years later and CORRUPT, Lawless, Unethical Judge James Haynes as well as the immoral unethical LAWLESS Missoula County Attorney are STILL trying to prove that Sean Boushie is a GOOD GUY, and that ALL of us are lying.
Though the record is pretty CLEAR and Convincing that we have all been harassed for years and threatened by Sean Boushie, while he was on Paid time by the University of Montana. Paid to harass us, intimidate us, find others to join him and all to try and stop our blogs exposing corruption.
It is all part of a program at the University of Montana and other Universities to pay Bloggers to harass Whistleblowers and to Retaliate in the EXTREME to try and SHUT us UP, Jail Us, ruin our lives, set us up for crimes, ruin our family connections and businesses and ALL to Protect Corruption in Montana. Corrupt Judges, Cops, Attorneys, Governors, Commissioners, Senators and to protect the University of Montana and their blatant ignoring RAPE and other crimes committed by people under their watch or paid by them.
It is CLEAR who are the Victims and who is the Criminal. Yet the Missoula County Attorney wants to keep up the Charade to falsely accuse Bill Windsor of Crimes he DID NOT commit.
Well I Say YAY.
Because the Trial will be Filmed, I will be there, taking the Stand, and so will many other people that Sean Boushie has emailed from SeanBoushie@Gmail.com - we shall see if the Missoula County attorney will keep breaking the law or if they will end up putting the real criminal in JAIL, which is those I and Spreadbury were exposing and Bill was reporting on, and Sean Boushie or if they will Jail the Whistleblower telling the 100% True Story about RAMPANT Corruption in Montana.
The State of Montana can Easily Subpoena Google and prove the BLATANT Obvious TRUTH that Sean Boushie controls SeanBoushie@Gmail.com and other emails he has used to threaten so many of us but they REFUSE.
See if they prove it then their guy is the bad guy and they eat CROW. See, though Detective Chris Shermer is a Cyber GENIUS he does not seem to know that he can ask, order Google to give the information. I myself have seen dozens of emails to me and others from that same eMail. Yet in Extreme whistle blower retaliation, the Missoula Police and the Missoula County Attorneys office REFUSE to get this easily obtained information, and why? All to set up an innocent man and cover up corruption in Montana.
Here is the Latest on the Bill Windsor Saga. Counting down the Days to the TRIAL, so we can FILM the total lack of competence of the Missoula County Attorney and the blatant CORRUPT Judge, Judge James Haynes. Oh and PROVE what is really going on at the University of Montana.
"Bill Windsor's Kangaroo Court Pre-Trial Conference was held on November 20, 2015
Bill Windsor was at the Missoula County Montana Courthouse with Judge James A. Haynes and Deputy Missoula County Attorney Jennifer Clark on November 20, 2015 for what was billed as the Pre-Trial Conference.
It was nothing more than a Kangaroo Court...
Judge James A. Haynes began the hearing by looking at Jennifer Clark and almost pleading with her to tell him the State of Montana had decided to drop the charges. When she sheepishly told him no, he became the nastiest judge I have yet experienced. There was a court reporter there, and I will immediately order the transcript, though every previous request for transcripts has gone unanswered and "minutes" of hearings have been falsified.
Judge James A. Haynes refused to even discuss dismissing the two bogus misdemeanor charges against me (Bill Windsor). So, the Trial of William Michael Windsor for allegedly sending an email to an attorney and for filming a movie will be held January 5-6, 2016 at the lovely Missoula County Courthouse in Missoula Montana. Please join me. I have confirmation of friends coming from as far away as Pennsylvania and Florida and from as nearby as Montana and Washington.
But in the second-best news of the day, Judge James A. Haynes says that the Court Rules allow the trial to be filmed, and so it shall be. So, if you can't be there in person, you will be able to watch it on YouTube, and I will have portions to use in Lawless America...The Movie.
Now, for the top news of the day, I NO LONGER HAVE TO WEAR A GPS ANKLE BRACELET. That baby was cut off my leg today by Jake at Compliance Monitoring Systems.
Prior to the Kangaroo Court session, I spent an hour with Jennifer Clark discussing the proposed Jury Instructions. It was very pleasant. She begged me several times to accept her settlement offer. I told her I would rather go to jail than agree to anything that would deny my Constitutional rights.
Jennifer Clark and the University of Montana have one objective -- to try to stop me from exposing the crimes of Sean Boushie and the University of Montana. Ain't gonna happen. I do once again feel that Jennifer Clark is being forced to pursue this case against me. It is clear to me that she didn't dismiss the bogus charges for one and only one reason -- because to do so would be very damaging to the malicious prosecution lawsuit that I will pursue.
In one of the more bizarre portions of this totally bizarre Kangaroo Court session, Judge James A. Haynes encouraged me to leave Montana and not show up for the trial.
Seriously. Because the charges are only misdemeanors, Montana cannot extradite me, and I cannot be "arrested" in another state due to these misdemeanor charges. Both Jennifer Clark and he would love it if I would do this because it would destroy my malicious prosecution lawsuit. Ain't gonna happen.
Judge James A. Haynes demeaned my friends at several points during the hearing, and he called me every name in the book.
Judge James A. Haynes said the Temporary Order of Protection was poor, yet he recently claimed it was valid for 546 days. It is amazing to me to watch him manufacture facts that don't exist, lie, distort facts that do exist, and completely and totally ignore the law. It is a mystery to me how he dismissed the three bogus felony charges against me. Legal experts tell me he did it because there was not a leg to stand on in allowing those charges to continue. But corrupt judges like Judge James A. Haynes do not usually let such things bother them.
Sean Boushie attended the hearing. He is the paid government cybserstalker who attempted to murder me on August 4, 2013. He's the one who Judge James A. Haynes refused to give me a protective order on by claiming I didn't qualify for a protective order because Sean Boushie had not yet been convicted (which the average person on the street knows is not the law). Sean Boushie was likely carrying a concealed handgun, and Judge James A. Haynes acknowledged this. He said that if I want security in the courtroom, I can hire my own private security. Seriously.
Sean Boushie is one of the ugliest people I have ever encountered, outside and in.
I didn't get the exact words scribbled down in my notes, but Judge James A. Haynes indicated this whole matter is a circus. He said that the trial will be interesting for people to "watch Mr. Windsor's antics." He said I love drama. Well, that's true. Gee, I'm in the movie-making business, so I LOVE drama.
I'd love to tell the jury just exactly what is happening, but if I did that, Judge James A. Haynes would throw the book at me. The maximum penalty would be 222 days in the Missoula County Detention Center and a $1,000 fine. I may just take that risk. In fact, I believe I will tell the jury and just let Judge James A. Haynes explode. He thinks the jury will decide I am not credible. I think the jury willl see that this is a Kangaroo Court with a corrupt judge and prosecutor.
I will be filing a Writ with the Montana Supreme Court on the unconstitutionality of the charges. The Montana Supreme Court is mega corrupt, and they hate my guts. So, I may not get very far with it. If not, at least I will have established the legal record in the case. Judge James A. Haynes laughed at me and noted that the Montana Supreme Court hates me. That is another of the few things that he said today that was true.
Judge James A. Haynes denied all of my motions, most without any discussion or explanation whatsoever. I am being allowed a total of only 20 pages for all my filings through the end of the trial. My Notice of Appeal will be many pages long just listing the atrocities, so I can't file much. Should I be found guilty, I will have my Notice of Appeal ready, and I will file it right there in the courtroom.
Dr. James A. Haynes diagnosed me as having a hearing problem. Guess I need to have that checked.
On the issue of denial of due process, he took credit for educating me as to that. I raised the issue on August 26, 2013, and he raised it on October 20, 2015, but Judge James A. Haynes thinks he's God's gift to judgeship. He's the only one who thinks that, but talk about Narcissistic, this guy gets a Capital N.
Judge James A. Haynes threatened me repeatedly during the "hearing." Between threatening me and demeaning me in every way possible, not much else was done. He indicated that he has been reading a lot of material that isn't part of the case. That is, of course, most improper, but no one will do anything about it."
Source and lot's more
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1855:bill-windsors-kangaroo-court-pre-trial-conference-was-held-on-november-20-2015&catid=158:news&Itemid=236
Also Check Out
http://lawlessamerica.com/
AND
Missoula Municipal Court Judge Sam Warren unlawfully restrained Bill Windsor for 546 days in a plot to get him
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1810:missoula-municipal-court-judge-sam-warren-unlawfully-restrained-bill-windsor-for-546-days-in-a-plot-to-get-him&catid=158:news&Itemid=236
They simply cover up crimes to support the money that comes into the University of Montana and to help hide rampant corruption in the State of Montana. Yet they spend massive time, money and resources to jail a senior citizen, an anti-corruption Film Producer, in an act of Retaliation against him for reporting on corruption in the State of Montana. As, he reported on my story of Sean Boushie threatening to kill me and Judge James Haynes refuse me protection. I had been reporting on Michael Spreadbury, a local anti-corruption blogger and whistleblower, and I was reporting on corruption in Lincoln County, Montana.
Bill Windsor reported on these stories and he had the exact same things happen to him and the EXACT same Judge. Now there will be a trial in January, we will ALL be there and the TRUTH will final come out. NO Montana won't care or act within the law, they never do. However, it will be filmed and they will be exposed.
Judge James Haynes is one of the "Handlers" in the State of Montana. He knew that Sean Boushie threatened to KILL me, Crystal Cox, years ago he denied me a protective Order. Yet another Judge in his district, Judge Robin Clute gave Sean Boushie a protective order against ME, and why? Well he lied, said I emailed myself the Death Threat, said he feared for his life.
Judges should NOT be above the LAW.
Judge James Haynes knows that Sean Boushie has threatened and harassed Michael Spreadbury also, see we were both reporting on TRUE corruption stories out of Hamilton MT, Ravalli County, Missoula County, Lincoln County and the University of Montana Law Students, as well as the rape Epidemic in Montana that authorities as well as the University of Montana were flat out ignoring.
All this, and here we are over 5 years later and CORRUPT, Lawless, Unethical Judge James Haynes as well as the immoral unethical LAWLESS Missoula County Attorney are STILL trying to prove that Sean Boushie is a GOOD GUY, and that ALL of us are lying.
Though the record is pretty CLEAR and Convincing that we have all been harassed for years and threatened by Sean Boushie, while he was on Paid time by the University of Montana. Paid to harass us, intimidate us, find others to join him and all to try and stop our blogs exposing corruption.
It is all part of a program at the University of Montana and other Universities to pay Bloggers to harass Whistleblowers and to Retaliate in the EXTREME to try and SHUT us UP, Jail Us, ruin our lives, set us up for crimes, ruin our family connections and businesses and ALL to Protect Corruption in Montana. Corrupt Judges, Cops, Attorneys, Governors, Commissioners, Senators and to protect the University of Montana and their blatant ignoring RAPE and other crimes committed by people under their watch or paid by them.
It is CLEAR who are the Victims and who is the Criminal. Yet the Missoula County Attorney wants to keep up the Charade to falsely accuse Bill Windsor of Crimes he DID NOT commit.
Well I Say YAY.
Because the Trial will be Filmed, I will be there, taking the Stand, and so will many other people that Sean Boushie has emailed from SeanBoushie@Gmail.com - we shall see if the Missoula County attorney will keep breaking the law or if they will end up putting the real criminal in JAIL, which is those I and Spreadbury were exposing and Bill was reporting on, and Sean Boushie or if they will Jail the Whistleblower telling the 100% True Story about RAMPANT Corruption in Montana.
The State of Montana can Easily Subpoena Google and prove the BLATANT Obvious TRUTH that Sean Boushie controls SeanBoushie@Gmail.com and other emails he has used to threaten so many of us but they REFUSE.
See if they prove it then their guy is the bad guy and they eat CROW. See, though Detective Chris Shermer is a Cyber GENIUS he does not seem to know that he can ask, order Google to give the information. I myself have seen dozens of emails to me and others from that same eMail. Yet in Extreme whistle blower retaliation, the Missoula Police and the Missoula County Attorneys office REFUSE to get this easily obtained information, and why? All to set up an innocent man and cover up corruption in Montana.Here is the Latest on the Bill Windsor Saga. Counting down the Days to the TRIAL, so we can FILM the total lack of competence of the Missoula County Attorney and the blatant CORRUPT Judge, Judge James Haynes. Oh and PROVE what is really going on at the University of Montana.
"Bill Windsor's Kangaroo Court Pre-Trial Conference was held on November 20, 2015
Bill Windsor was at the Missoula County Montana Courthouse with Judge James A. Haynes and Deputy Missoula County Attorney Jennifer Clark on November 20, 2015 for what was billed as the Pre-Trial Conference.
It was nothing more than a Kangaroo Court...
Judge James A. Haynes began the hearing by looking at Jennifer Clark and almost pleading with her to tell him the State of Montana had decided to drop the charges. When she sheepishly told him no, he became the nastiest judge I have yet experienced. There was a court reporter there, and I will immediately order the transcript, though every previous request for transcripts has gone unanswered and "minutes" of hearings have been falsified.
Judge James A. Haynes refused to even discuss dismissing the two bogus misdemeanor charges against me (Bill Windsor). So, the Trial of William Michael Windsor for allegedly sending an email to an attorney and for filming a movie will be held January 5-6, 2016 at the lovely Missoula County Courthouse in Missoula Montana. Please join me. I have confirmation of friends coming from as far away as Pennsylvania and Florida and from as nearby as Montana and Washington.
But in the second-best news of the day, Judge James A. Haynes says that the Court Rules allow the trial to be filmed, and so it shall be. So, if you can't be there in person, you will be able to watch it on YouTube, and I will have portions to use in Lawless America...The Movie.
Now, for the top news of the day, I NO LONGER HAVE TO WEAR A GPS ANKLE BRACELET. That baby was cut off my leg today by Jake at Compliance Monitoring Systems.
Prior to the Kangaroo Court session, I spent an hour with Jennifer Clark discussing the proposed Jury Instructions. It was very pleasant. She begged me several times to accept her settlement offer. I told her I would rather go to jail than agree to anything that would deny my Constitutional rights.
Jennifer Clark and the University of Montana have one objective -- to try to stop me from exposing the crimes of Sean Boushie and the University of Montana. Ain't gonna happen. I do once again feel that Jennifer Clark is being forced to pursue this case against me. It is clear to me that she didn't dismiss the bogus charges for one and only one reason -- because to do so would be very damaging to the malicious prosecution lawsuit that I will pursue.
In one of the more bizarre portions of this totally bizarre Kangaroo Court session, Judge James A. Haynes encouraged me to leave Montana and not show up for the trial.
Seriously. Because the charges are only misdemeanors, Montana cannot extradite me, and I cannot be "arrested" in another state due to these misdemeanor charges. Both Jennifer Clark and he would love it if I would do this because it would destroy my malicious prosecution lawsuit. Ain't gonna happen.
Judge James A. Haynes demeaned my friends at several points during the hearing, and he called me every name in the book.
Judge James A. Haynes said the Temporary Order of Protection was poor, yet he recently claimed it was valid for 546 days. It is amazing to me to watch him manufacture facts that don't exist, lie, distort facts that do exist, and completely and totally ignore the law. It is a mystery to me how he dismissed the three bogus felony charges against me. Legal experts tell me he did it because there was not a leg to stand on in allowing those charges to continue. But corrupt judges like Judge James A. Haynes do not usually let such things bother them.
Sean Boushie attended the hearing. He is the paid government cybserstalker who attempted to murder me on August 4, 2013. He's the one who Judge James A. Haynes refused to give me a protective order on by claiming I didn't qualify for a protective order because Sean Boushie had not yet been convicted (which the average person on the street knows is not the law). Sean Boushie was likely carrying a concealed handgun, and Judge James A. Haynes acknowledged this. He said that if I want security in the courtroom, I can hire my own private security. Seriously.
Sean Boushie is one of the ugliest people I have ever encountered, outside and in.
I didn't get the exact words scribbled down in my notes, but Judge James A. Haynes indicated this whole matter is a circus. He said that the trial will be interesting for people to "watch Mr. Windsor's antics." He said I love drama. Well, that's true. Gee, I'm in the movie-making business, so I LOVE drama.
I'd love to tell the jury just exactly what is happening, but if I did that, Judge James A. Haynes would throw the book at me. The maximum penalty would be 222 days in the Missoula County Detention Center and a $1,000 fine. I may just take that risk. In fact, I believe I will tell the jury and just let Judge James A. Haynes explode. He thinks the jury will decide I am not credible. I think the jury willl see that this is a Kangaroo Court with a corrupt judge and prosecutor.
I will be filing a Writ with the Montana Supreme Court on the unconstitutionality of the charges. The Montana Supreme Court is mega corrupt, and they hate my guts. So, I may not get very far with it. If not, at least I will have established the legal record in the case. Judge James A. Haynes laughed at me and noted that the Montana Supreme Court hates me. That is another of the few things that he said today that was true.
Judge James A. Haynes denied all of my motions, most without any discussion or explanation whatsoever. I am being allowed a total of only 20 pages for all my filings through the end of the trial. My Notice of Appeal will be many pages long just listing the atrocities, so I can't file much. Should I be found guilty, I will have my Notice of Appeal ready, and I will file it right there in the courtroom.
Dr. James A. Haynes diagnosed me as having a hearing problem. Guess I need to have that checked.
On the issue of denial of due process, he took credit for educating me as to that. I raised the issue on August 26, 2013, and he raised it on October 20, 2015, but Judge James A. Haynes thinks he's God's gift to judgeship. He's the only one who thinks that, but talk about Narcissistic, this guy gets a Capital N.
Judge James A. Haynes threatened me repeatedly during the "hearing." Between threatening me and demeaning me in every way possible, not much else was done. He indicated that he has been reading a lot of material that isn't part of the case. That is, of course, most improper, but no one will do anything about it."
Source and lot's more
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1855:bill-windsors-kangaroo-court-pre-trial-conference-was-held-on-november-20-2015&catid=158:news&Itemid=236
Also Check Out
http://lawlessamerica.com/
AND
Missoula Municipal Court Judge Sam Warren unlawfully restrained Bill Windsor for 546 days in a plot to get him
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1810:missoula-municipal-court-judge-sam-warren-unlawfully-restrained-bill-windsor-for-546-days-in-a-plot-to-get-him&catid=158:news&Itemid=236
Detective Chris Shermer, Missoula County Attorney, University of Montana, Missoula County, Missoula Police, Ravalli County and many others in the Bill Windsor case have BROKE THE LAW. They have violated Civil Rights, Lied on sworn Documents, Failed to Protect the Public and used positions of power to SUPPRESS speech, jail a whistleblower, harass a journalist, and try and JAIL an anti-corruption Film Producer. You will all Face hundreds of MILLIONS in Civil suits and hopefully some jail time yourselves.
Criminal and Civil RICO Complaints will be filed, Attorney General Complaints will be filed, Civil and Human Rights lawsuits will be filed, and the TRUTH will be BOLDLY Lit.
Keep in mind that Judge James Haynes knew Sean Boushie was dangerous, and knew Sean Boushie threatened to KILL me, Crystal Cox years ago. These same parties persecuted me, the victim and aided and abetted Sean Boushie, the Missoula Police and the University of Montana to completely ignore my rights and safety and the LAW.
These authorities involved in the Bill Windsor whistleblower retaliation case, have a pattern and history that is easily proven and they have massive amounts of facts of who is the real danger and parties flat out lying yet they decided to jail and persecute a film producer reporting on REAL, True Corruption in Montana and protected by the University of Montana,
"Judge James A. Haynes has dismissed three felony criminal charges against Bill Windsor"
"Two misdemeanor charges are still being considered for dismissal...
I didn't have time to read the order initially. But I read the last page to learn that Judge James A. Haynes dismissed the three felony charges that could have had me spend six years in the Montana State Prison in "beautiful" Deer Lodge Montana, just North, South, East, and West of the Montana boonies. The town does, however, have the World's Largest Railroad Spike proudly displayed "downtown.
There were five charges. In Montana, your first two protective order "crimes" are misdemeanors. You have to be convicted. I wasn't, but the Persecutor charged two misdemeanors and three felonies. Not legal or nice. But what's relevant now is that I am down to two misdemeanors. This means I WON'T GO TO PRISON! The maximum penalty for each misdemeanor is six months in the Missoula County Detention Center and $500 fine. I don't plan to be found guilty of anything since I didn't commit any crimes, but I have already spent 134 days in the slammer, so eight month would be the max. And I can't imagine serving another day. That said, the Missoula County Detention Center is quite nice. The food is excellent. Their mattresses actually have padding in them. The cells are nice, and the cell doors are open to the common area virtually the entire day. It was by far the best of my three jails.
Judge James A Haynes dismissed the charges for the alleged Tweet. (Aw shucks, I can no longer hold the title of The World's Most Notorious Tweeter.") And he dismissed the two charges where Sean Boushie's name was published online in two legal documents.
He got a lot of the facts wrong and ignored the excellent law that I presented. So, don't take pages 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 at face value.
The charges that could still be dismissed are the email of a required legal filing to the University of Montana attorney and not giving Sean Boushie my TV show website. From reading his order, I think these charges will be dismissed as well.
On the email charge, Judge James A. Haynes wrote that the "TOP contains no prohibition from emailing documents to an attorney at the University of Montana about a matter in litigation. ... Frankly, the Court is having trouble connecting the allegations in Count V to anything related to protecting Sean Boushie. Moreover, the blanket reference to "U of M Staff" appears overly broad."
On the website charge, Judge James A. Haynes wrote: "The District Court... expresses concern that Windsor (or the website's legal owner) has or may have a property interest in this site.... The 'release the website' condition may have been inartfully considered as it does nothing to prevent Windsor's ongoing ..use of the several other websites and Facebook accounts listed by Sean Boushie to which Windsor has online access. Finally, Windsor appears to have the defenses that this condition is overly broad since Boushie never sought "release" in his application for order of protection...."
Judge James A. Haynes claims the TEMPORARY Order of Protection ("TOP") was valid for 546 days. No way, but that's what he says on the last page of the order.
I am very happy to say this is a big deal. What has just happened is that a lowly pro se defendant charged with three felonies facing six years in prison has won against a hotshot county prosecuting attorney. Things like this just don't happen -- to me or to many people. Judge James A. Haynes obviously did the right thing on three of the charges, and I hope he will do the right thing on the other two.
I had a feeling the order was coming because after hearing nothing from her for weeks, I got an email yesterday from Jennifer Clark, the prosecutor, saying she was sending some documents that I had been requesting. That told me that there was likely an order coming and that she knew at least one of the charges was still pending.
And if the other two charges aren't dismissed, I will get to try the case in front of a jury on January 4, 2016. That is an experience that I will enjoy immensely."
Source
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1834:judge-james-a-haynes-has-dismissed-three-felony-criminal-charges-against-bill-windsor&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236
There will be lot's more to come as Jennifer Clark and Detective Chris Shermer and the GANG have Failed miserable in protecting the public and Telling the TRUTH. The dismissals will be Just the Begining of this INVESTIGATION and pending legal action against YOU ALL.
Click Below to Read the Dismissal Order
http://lawlessamerica.com/images/stories/montana/DC-14-509/dc-14-509-order-counts-i-ii-iv-dismissed-2015-10-30.pdf
Sean Boushie Flat out LIED to the Missoula Police. Missoula County Attorney, Judges and the University of Montana have done nothing for nearly a decade now to protect the public. As they have been repeatedly shown massive proof by Bill Windsor, Michael Spreadbury and Crystal Cox (me).
Keep in mind that Judge James Haynes knew Sean Boushie was dangerous, and knew Sean Boushie threatened to KILL me, Crystal Cox years ago. These same parties persecuted me, the victim and aided and abetted Sean Boushie, the Missoula Police and the University of Montana to completely ignore my rights and safety and the LAW.
These authorities involved in the Bill Windsor whistleblower retaliation case, have a pattern and history that is easily proven and they have massive amounts of facts of who is the real danger and parties flat out lying yet they decided to jail and persecute a film producer reporting on REAL, True Corruption in Montana and protected by the University of Montana,
"Judge James A. Haynes has dismissed three felony criminal charges against Bill Windsor"
"Two misdemeanor charges are still being considered for dismissal...
I didn't have time to read the order initially. But I read the last page to learn that Judge James A. Haynes dismissed the three felony charges that could have had me spend six years in the Montana State Prison in "beautiful" Deer Lodge Montana, just North, South, East, and West of the Montana boonies. The town does, however, have the World's Largest Railroad Spike proudly displayed "downtown.
There were five charges. In Montana, your first two protective order "crimes" are misdemeanors. You have to be convicted. I wasn't, but the Persecutor charged two misdemeanors and three felonies. Not legal or nice. But what's relevant now is that I am down to two misdemeanors. This means I WON'T GO TO PRISON! The maximum penalty for each misdemeanor is six months in the Missoula County Detention Center and $500 fine. I don't plan to be found guilty of anything since I didn't commit any crimes, but I have already spent 134 days in the slammer, so eight month would be the max. And I can't imagine serving another day. That said, the Missoula County Detention Center is quite nice. The food is excellent. Their mattresses actually have padding in them. The cells are nice, and the cell doors are open to the common area virtually the entire day. It was by far the best of my three jails.
Judge James A Haynes dismissed the charges for the alleged Tweet. (Aw shucks, I can no longer hold the title of The World's Most Notorious Tweeter.") And he dismissed the two charges where Sean Boushie's name was published online in two legal documents.
He got a lot of the facts wrong and ignored the excellent law that I presented. So, don't take pages 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 at face value.
The charges that could still be dismissed are the email of a required legal filing to the University of Montana attorney and not giving Sean Boushie my TV show website. From reading his order, I think these charges will be dismissed as well.
On the email charge, Judge James A. Haynes wrote that the "TOP contains no prohibition from emailing documents to an attorney at the University of Montana about a matter in litigation. ... Frankly, the Court is having trouble connecting the allegations in Count V to anything related to protecting Sean Boushie. Moreover, the blanket reference to "U of M Staff" appears overly broad."
On the website charge, Judge James A. Haynes wrote: "The District Court... expresses concern that Windsor (or the website's legal owner) has or may have a property interest in this site.... The 'release the website' condition may have been inartfully considered as it does nothing to prevent Windsor's ongoing ..use of the several other websites and Facebook accounts listed by Sean Boushie to which Windsor has online access. Finally, Windsor appears to have the defenses that this condition is overly broad since Boushie never sought "release" in his application for order of protection...."
Judge James A. Haynes claims the TEMPORARY Order of Protection ("TOP") was valid for 546 days. No way, but that's what he says on the last page of the order.
I am very happy to say this is a big deal. What has just happened is that a lowly pro se defendant charged with three felonies facing six years in prison has won against a hotshot county prosecuting attorney. Things like this just don't happen -- to me or to many people. Judge James A. Haynes obviously did the right thing on three of the charges, and I hope he will do the right thing on the other two.
I had a feeling the order was coming because after hearing nothing from her for weeks, I got an email yesterday from Jennifer Clark, the prosecutor, saying she was sending some documents that I had been requesting. That told me that there was likely an order coming and that she knew at least one of the charges was still pending.
And if the other two charges aren't dismissed, I will get to try the case in front of a jury on January 4, 2016. That is an experience that I will enjoy immensely."
Source
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1834:judge-james-a-haynes-has-dismissed-three-felony-criminal-charges-against-bill-windsor&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236
There will be lot's more to come as Jennifer Clark and Detective Chris Shermer and the GANG have Failed miserable in protecting the public and Telling the TRUTH. The dismissals will be Just the Begining of this INVESTIGATION and pending legal action against YOU ALL.
Click Below to Read the Dismissal Order
http://lawlessamerica.com/images/stories/montana/DC-14-509/dc-14-509-order-counts-i-ii-iv-dismissed-2015-10-30.pdf
Sean Boushie Flat out LIED to the Missoula Police. Missoula County Attorney, Judges and the University of Montana have done nothing for nearly a decade now to protect the public. As they have been repeatedly shown massive proof by Bill Windsor, Michael Spreadbury and Crystal Cox (me).
Montana Corruption Cover up Continues. But will NOT go Unreported.
Felony Tweeting; Facing Prison for Tweeting - Update from Bill Windsor September 13, 2015; the State of Montana uses Protective Orders to Suppress Speech of those who expose Corruption in Montana. The State of Montana will do whatever it takes to SILENCE anti-corruption bloggers, journalists.
The Bill Windsor case is a clear violation of Human Rights, Civil Rights, Constitutional Rights, Ethics and Law. And all to chill speech, to suppress speech, to violate First Amendment rights, and to hide decades if not centuries of massive evil, dirty dealings, oppression, crime and corruption in the State of Montana done by Judges, Cops, Detectives, the Supreme Court, County Attorneys, the University of Montana and many more divisions of law and state governing bodies.
The Bill Windsor case documents massive corruption in the State of Montana like no other case and it will trickle down to massive amounts of cases in Montana where these same folks violated people's Civil and Human rights to do just as the please, without consideration of law, ethics, REAL Montana Values, and constitutional rights.
These Montana Law Enforcement, Montana Judges, Montana Cops and Detectives, and all involved in this case have done something so massively evil here. As the right to speak, the right to not be threatened to be killed, and the right to tell the TRUTH has been seriously violated.
Bill Windsor has a HUGE, Clear and Convincing Civil Rights case against the State of Montana, State of Idaho, Ravalli County Montana, Missoula County Montana, Sean Boushie, the University of Montana, Royce Engstrom personally an professionally, Jennifer Clark personally and professionally, Chris Shermer personally and professionally, Judge Jim Haynes personally and professionally, the Missoula County Attorney office, the Missoula County Police and many MANY more.
And the all did so with willful intent to maliciously harm Bill Windsor and with full knowledge of what they were doing. As these exact same people and governing bodies as well as the University of Montana did this to me Crystal Cox when I was reporting on Peter Pilkey and Michael Spreadbury exposing corruption in Hamilton Montana and reporting on the historical recall efforts in Lincoln County Montana to recall Sheriff Darrel Anderson, as well as rampant corruption in Lincoln County Montana.
All those I allege are guilty of Civil Rights Violations against Bill Windsor, did so with malicious intent. The record clearly shows they did the same thing to Michael Spreadbury, Montana Investigative Blogger and to Crystal Cox, myself. They knew all this was happening long before Bill Windsor and deliberately violated his Civil Rights in Extreme Retaliation for him exposing their corrupt, unethical and unconstitutional actions.
There is pattern and history and I believe also RICO claims to be made against all of the above.
Bill Windsor is liberating massive victims of all kinds of corruption, violence and oppression in the State of Montana.
I, Crystal Cox, went as far as I could and to go further would have faced false imprisonment, violence to me and possibly even death as threatened to me. I lost everything I knew to be my life, as did anyone who believed in me or cared about me. The amount of people connected to this is staggering and Bill Windsor is redeeming us all with the Truth.
What happened to me with these same people changed the course of my life forever and put me under years of torture and duress and massive economic loss, family loss, friends and more as I stood against them best I could for as long as I could.
What happened to Michael Spreadbury with these SAME people and entities changed the course of his life forever and put him under massive hardship for simply doing the right thing.
Michael Spreadbury is a very good investigative reporter, a strong and smart man, an educated man, and a man of true justice. He stood against all odds against all of these folks and they caused him massive harm year after year. They violated Michael Spreadbury's civil rights to the extreme.
Bill Windsor, a man with a big heart, smart mind, incredible follow through and focus, creative, bold, altruistic and lot's of moxy, rode in on a white horse and breathed life into something that was about to take the lives of many that he may never know, including myself.
Bill Windsor is a hero to me, he always will be. And he is a Hero to every citizen in Montana, whether they know or not. As a 4th generation Montanan, I wept deeply at what was happening to people, to victims of these same people for decades. And as I attempted to report their story, I was retaliated against and eventually left my home town, my state, my people to save my life from these very people.
Bill speaks for all who cannot. He is giving voice to voiceless he may never personally know. And for all those victims of rape, corruption, violence in the state of Montana, Bill Windsor has brought hope.
Those who personally know me know that I am deeply spiritual and I tell you what Bill Windsor was an answer to my prayers, and to the prayers of so many fighting for their life against the Wall of Corruption in the State of Montana. Bill Windsor is of the light, a man of great Holiness sent to help us by the Great Spirit. A man of White Light, Healing, and a powerful spiritual warrior and messenger standing for us all and against the most extreme of odds.
Corruption and being powerless in corrupt courts though you have stacks of proof is something that take a huge toll on our soul, brings a great darkness and grief that can only be understood by those who have lived it. It is intensely spiritual to bring light to this people by creating a path for them to come out of the dark. Bill Windsor has done this.
Bill Windsor's case makes a beautiful passage of light for all victims in the State of Montana to STAND Up, Fight Back, and perservere against extreme retaliation and corruption.
Victims of Domestic Violence, rape victims, victims of economic terrorism whereby if you don't do as the corrupt official say then you lose your job or way to make a money and are usually ran out of town, victims of all manner of crimes, civil rights and human rights violations who simply had no rights at all until the Internet and they could tell their story. However, the State of Montana found a way to actually DELETE the First Amendment rights, and they did this for years upon years with unethical, illegal and unconstitutional protective orders.
Also Check out
http://missoulacountyattorney.blogspot.com/
http://www.LawlessAmerica.com/
http://ChrisShermer.blogspot.com/
http://montanacorruption.blogspot.com/
The Bill Windsor case documents massive corruption in the State of Montana like no other case and it will trickle down to massive amounts of cases in Montana where these same folks violated people's Civil and Human rights to do just as the please, without consideration of law, ethics, REAL Montana Values, and constitutional rights.
These Montana Law Enforcement, Montana Judges, Montana Cops and Detectives, and all involved in this case have done something so massively evil here. As the right to speak, the right to not be threatened to be killed, and the right to tell the TRUTH has been seriously violated.
Bill Windsor has a HUGE, Clear and Convincing Civil Rights case against the State of Montana, State of Idaho, Ravalli County Montana, Missoula County Montana, Sean Boushie, the University of Montana, Royce Engstrom personally an professionally, Jennifer Clark personally and professionally, Chris Shermer personally and professionally, Judge Jim Haynes personally and professionally, the Missoula County Attorney office, the Missoula County Police and many MANY more.
And the all did so with willful intent to maliciously harm Bill Windsor and with full knowledge of what they were doing. As these exact same people and governing bodies as well as the University of Montana did this to me Crystal Cox when I was reporting on Peter Pilkey and Michael Spreadbury exposing corruption in Hamilton Montana and reporting on the historical recall efforts in Lincoln County Montana to recall Sheriff Darrel Anderson, as well as rampant corruption in Lincoln County Montana.
All those I allege are guilty of Civil Rights Violations against Bill Windsor, did so with malicious intent. The record clearly shows they did the same thing to Michael Spreadbury, Montana Investigative Blogger and to Crystal Cox, myself. They knew all this was happening long before Bill Windsor and deliberately violated his Civil Rights in Extreme Retaliation for him exposing their corrupt, unethical and unconstitutional actions.
There is pattern and history and I believe also RICO claims to be made against all of the above.
Bill Windsor is liberating massive victims of all kinds of corruption, violence and oppression in the State of Montana.
I, Crystal Cox, went as far as I could and to go further would have faced false imprisonment, violence to me and possibly even death as threatened to me. I lost everything I knew to be my life, as did anyone who believed in me or cared about me. The amount of people connected to this is staggering and Bill Windsor is redeeming us all with the Truth.
What happened to me with these same people changed the course of my life forever and put me under years of torture and duress and massive economic loss, family loss, friends and more as I stood against them best I could for as long as I could.
What happened to Michael Spreadbury with these SAME people and entities changed the course of his life forever and put him under massive hardship for simply doing the right thing.
Michael Spreadbury is a very good investigative reporter, a strong and smart man, an educated man, and a man of true justice. He stood against all odds against all of these folks and they caused him massive harm year after year. They violated Michael Spreadbury's civil rights to the extreme.
Bill Windsor, a man with a big heart, smart mind, incredible follow through and focus, creative, bold, altruistic and lot's of moxy, rode in on a white horse and breathed life into something that was about to take the lives of many that he may never know, including myself.
Bill Windsor is a hero to me, he always will be. And he is a Hero to every citizen in Montana, whether they know or not. As a 4th generation Montanan, I wept deeply at what was happening to people, to victims of these same people for decades. And as I attempted to report their story, I was retaliated against and eventually left my home town, my state, my people to save my life from these very people.
Bill speaks for all who cannot. He is giving voice to voiceless he may never personally know. And for all those victims of rape, corruption, violence in the state of Montana, Bill Windsor has brought hope.
Those who personally know me know that I am deeply spiritual and I tell you what Bill Windsor was an answer to my prayers, and to the prayers of so many fighting for their life against the Wall of Corruption in the State of Montana. Bill Windsor is of the light, a man of great Holiness sent to help us by the Great Spirit. A man of White Light, Healing, and a powerful spiritual warrior and messenger standing for us all and against the most extreme of odds.
Corruption and being powerless in corrupt courts though you have stacks of proof is something that take a huge toll on our soul, brings a great darkness and grief that can only be understood by those who have lived it. It is intensely spiritual to bring light to this people by creating a path for them to come out of the dark. Bill Windsor has done this.
Bill Windsor's case makes a beautiful passage of light for all victims in the State of Montana to STAND Up, Fight Back, and perservere against extreme retaliation and corruption.
Victims of Domestic Violence, rape victims, victims of economic terrorism whereby if you don't do as the corrupt official say then you lose your job or way to make a money and are usually ran out of town, victims of all manner of crimes, civil rights and human rights violations who simply had no rights at all until the Internet and they could tell their story. However, the State of Montana found a way to actually DELETE the First Amendment rights, and they did this for years upon years with unethical, illegal and unconstitutional protective orders.
Take a Look at Bill Windsors recent update on all this and some back story.
Also Check out
http://missoulacountyattorney.blogspot.com/
http://www.LawlessAmerica.com/
http://ChrisShermer.blogspot.com/
http://montanacorruption.blogspot.com/
The State of Montana Unethically, Unconstitutionally, and illegally uses PROTECTIVE orders to flat out STOP the flow of information, to STOP anti-corruption bloggers and to aid and abet corruption in Montana. The Bill Windsor Case is nationally highlighting what the State of Montana does to it's prey (those who dare to tell the Truth about Montana corruption).
The State of Montana is acting completely outside of law and the constitution of the United States of America and this is not the first time.
The State of Montana does this SAME THING, this same way to any blogger who dares to expose corruption in the State of Montana.
Blogging is a constitutionally protected activity, yet Montana courts uses unconstitutional protective orders to shut down blogs, stop tweet and STOP the flow of information online that reports on corruption in Government in the State of Montana.
The State of Montana all parties should be indicted and sued in civil court as well to expose this behavior and to STOP it from happening from this day forward as well as paying large amounts of money in judgments against them for who the State of Montana has selectively prosecuted and whose human rights they have violated in the past to protect corruption in the State of Montana and to protect the University of Montana.
"TV CREW IS SEEKING PERMISSION FROM JUDGE JAMES A. HAYNES TO FILM THE FELONY TWEETING TRIAL OF WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
I was approached last week by a TV crew that wanted to know if I would support their efforts to film my trial. I told them I would be delighted.
I understand the producer is preparing to file a motion seeking approval. Here is some of what was shared with me:
"The Defendant, Mr. William Windsor, is documenting public corruption, and he has done an excellent job at it. For the last three years, he has documented and shown corruption at all levels of Government, and that apparently has made him a target by those in Government, particularly those who are engaged in mal acts.
"I am concerned with what I am seeing in this case. Mr. Windsor is apparently being prosecuted for a tweet made on Twitter? My education in Law School seems to tell me that this is an issue that is clearly protected under the First Amendment. Why this is even being prosecuted is beyond me other than as retaliation.
"Further, Mr. Windsor has demonstrated that there is a reasonable chance he was not the person who even sent the tweet (which again is protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution). So, it's questionable whether probable cause even exists. In fact, it's a likely violation of the First Amendment.
"I have read some of the information that Mr. Windsor has provided on Sean Boushie. I am concerned about the actions of Mr. Boushie which include countless threats against Bill Windsor and his actions which amount to flagrant intimidation and retaliatory statements to Mr. Windsor.
According to the facts stated by Mr. Windsor, it appears that on occasions Mr. Boushie has suggested that he was going to kill Mr. Windsor or has outright said he would.
"It appears that several Montana Courts have overlooked these allegations and have not even held a hearing into the validity of the allegations that Mr. Windsor has raised. If all that I have read is true, it would appear that the Courts have no interest in curbing this behavior by Mr. Boushie.
Again, at no point in time has the Court acknowledged this or taken judicial notice of the allegations by Mr. Windsor. This is outrageous.
"So, it appears that Mr. Windsor is being prosecuted to assault Mr. Windsor and/or protect Mr. Boushie, and justice is not the end game. This is one of the pure instances in which a camera is certainly needed.
"The Defendant in this case needs a fair trial, and it is well-established that videotaping a trial keeps people more honest.
"This is a significant case. What seems to be at stake here is not only Mr. Windsor and his livelihood, but the many hundreds, if not thousands, of people he has videotaped over the years.
If he loses his case, then their ability to have their stories told to a wider audience will likely be affected. This is a sad state of affairs that many tax-paying Americans have been harmed due to the actions of government actors, and it appears that someone wanting to fix this great injustice is going to be attacked to keep this from being made aware to more people."
Source
https://www.facebook.com/billwindsor1/posts/10207968138827881
The State of Montana does this SAME THING, this same way to any blogger who dares to expose corruption in the State of Montana.
Blogging is a constitutionally protected activity, yet Montana courts uses unconstitutional protective orders to shut down blogs, stop tweet and STOP the flow of information online that reports on corruption in Government in the State of Montana.
The State of Montana all parties should be indicted and sued in civil court as well to expose this behavior and to STOP it from happening from this day forward as well as paying large amounts of money in judgments against them for who the State of Montana has selectively prosecuted and whose human rights they have violated in the past to protect corruption in the State of Montana and to protect the University of Montana.
"TV CREW IS SEEKING PERMISSION FROM JUDGE JAMES A. HAYNES TO FILM THE FELONY TWEETING TRIAL OF WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
I was approached last week by a TV crew that wanted to know if I would support their efforts to film my trial. I told them I would be delighted.
I understand the producer is preparing to file a motion seeking approval. Here is some of what was shared with me:
"The Defendant, Mr. William Windsor, is documenting public corruption, and he has done an excellent job at it. For the last three years, he has documented and shown corruption at all levels of Government, and that apparently has made him a target by those in Government, particularly those who are engaged in mal acts.
"I am concerned with what I am seeing in this case. Mr. Windsor is apparently being prosecuted for a tweet made on Twitter? My education in Law School seems to tell me that this is an issue that is clearly protected under the First Amendment. Why this is even being prosecuted is beyond me other than as retaliation.
"Further, Mr. Windsor has demonstrated that there is a reasonable chance he was not the person who even sent the tweet (which again is protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution). So, it's questionable whether probable cause even exists. In fact, it's a likely violation of the First Amendment.
"I have read some of the information that Mr. Windsor has provided on Sean Boushie. I am concerned about the actions of Mr. Boushie which include countless threats against Bill Windsor and his actions which amount to flagrant intimidation and retaliatory statements to Mr. Windsor.
According to the facts stated by Mr. Windsor, it appears that on occasions Mr. Boushie has suggested that he was going to kill Mr. Windsor or has outright said he would.
"It appears that several Montana Courts have overlooked these allegations and have not even held a hearing into the validity of the allegations that Mr. Windsor has raised. If all that I have read is true, it would appear that the Courts have no interest in curbing this behavior by Mr. Boushie.
Again, at no point in time has the Court acknowledged this or taken judicial notice of the allegations by Mr. Windsor. This is outrageous.
"So, it appears that Mr. Windsor is being prosecuted to assault Mr. Windsor and/or protect Mr. Boushie, and justice is not the end game. This is one of the pure instances in which a camera is certainly needed.
"The Defendant in this case needs a fair trial, and it is well-established that videotaping a trial keeps people more honest.
"This is a significant case. What seems to be at stake here is not only Mr. Windsor and his livelihood, but the many hundreds, if not thousands, of people he has videotaped over the years.
If he loses his case, then their ability to have their stories told to a wider audience will likely be affected. This is a sad state of affairs that many tax-paying Americans have been harmed due to the actions of government actors, and it appears that someone wanting to fix this great injustice is going to be attacked to keep this from being made aware to more people."
Source
https://www.facebook.com/billwindsor1/posts/10207968138827881
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)